RERA Cases Monthly Digest: June 2024

Aryan Raj

4 July 2024 6:45 PM IST

  • RERA Cases Monthly Digest: June 2024

    Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority Despite Offering Alternate Flat To Homebuyer, Builder Failed To Hand Over Possession On Time, Karnataka RERA Orders Refund Case – Devdas Pandurang Shetti & another Versus M/s Mantri Developers Pvt. Ltd. & others Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising GR Reddy (Member), has directed the builder...

    Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    Despite Offering Alternate Flat To Homebuyer, Builder Failed To Hand Over Possession On Time, Karnataka RERA Orders Refund

    Case – Devdas Pandurang Shetti & another Versus M/s Mantri Developers Pvt. Ltd. & others

    Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising GR Reddy (Member), has directed the builder to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer to purchase the flat with interest after the builder failed to deliver the alternate flat.

    Builder Fails To Deliver Flat In Time, Karnataka RERA Orders Refund To Homebuyer

    Case – Loknath Nayak & another Versus Supervision Towers Private Limited

    Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Neelmani N Raju (Member), has directed the builder to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer for a flat, as the builder failed to deliver possession as promised for the year 2021.

    Builder Failed To Commence Construction Even After Two Years From Agreement Date, Karnataka RERA Orders Refund To Homebuyer

    Case – Dabasish Gayen Versus GVG Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and others

    Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising GR Reddy (Member), has directed the builder to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer for a flat, as the builder failed to start construction of the project even after two years from the date of entering into the agreement for sale with the homebuyer.

    Karnataka RERA Orders Builder To Pay Interest To Homebuyer For Delayed Possession In GM Global Techies Town Project

    Case – Sudipta Majumder Versus M/S Gulam Mustafa Enterprises Pvt. Ltd

    Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising GR Reddy (Member), has directed the builder to pay nine lakh rupees to the homebuyer as interest for the delay in handing over possession of the flat in the GM Global Techies Town Tower C Project.

    Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    UP RERA Issues Public Notice For Builders To Attend Online Hearing Of 28 Complaints

    Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP RERA) has issued a public notice in newspapers, directing builders from various districts of the state to attend and present their case in the online hearing of 28 complaints scheduled on different dates in the upcoming month.

    UPRERA Expresses Displeasure Over Non-Registration Of Properties By Prayagraj Development Authority

    Press Note UPRERA/24/May/2024

    Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP RERA) Chairman Sanjay Bhoosreddy has expressed strong displeasure over the non-registration of properties belonging to nine allottees of the Alaknanda Project by the Prayagraj Development Authority, despite the UPRERA order and the issuance of a completion certificate (CC) in January 2024.

    UP RERA Releases Model Format Of Offer Of Possession Letter To Protect Homebuyers Interest

    Press Release / 8 June / 2024

    Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP-RERA) has issued a directive aimed at curbing the arbitrary practices of real estate promoters in issuing Offer of Possession letters. This move is intended to eliminate the confusion and disputes that arise between promoters and allottees over possession terms.

    UP RERA Introduces Standard Format for Written Arguments

    Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP RERA) has prepared a standard format for written arguments to ensure the speedy resolution of ongoing cases at its headquarters and regional offices.

    UPRERA Directs Builder To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Of Commercial Units In Festival City Project, Noida

    Case – Himanshu Sethi, Tripta Sethi and another with 8 Others Versus Mist Direct Sales Private Limited

    Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UPRERA) bench, comprising T. Venkatesh (Member), directed the builder, Mist Direct Sales Private Limited (Bhasin Group), to deliver possession of nine commercial units and pay interest for delayed possession in the Festival City Phase III project, Noida.

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    Builder Failed To Hand Over Possession Even After Delay Of 11 Years, Haryana RERA Orders Refund To Homebuyer With Interest

    Case - Jogender Singh Malik Versus TDI Infrastructure Limited

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority), Panchkula bench, comprising of Dr. Geeta Rathee Singh (Member) and Chander Shekhar (Member), has directed the builder to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer to purchase a flat with 10.85% interest, after the builder failed to hand over possession even after a delay of eleven years.

    Haryana RERA Upholds Builder's Termination Of Flat Booking After Homebuyer Failed To Make Timely Payments

    Case – Dilbag Sharma & another Versus M3M India Private Limited

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Ashok Sangwan (Member), upholds the builder's termination of the flat booking after the homebuyer failed to fulfill timely payment obligations.

    Haryana RERA Orders Interest To Homebuyer For Delayed Possession, Also Holds Agreement Is Biased

    Case – Arun Jain & another Versus M/S Emaar India Ltd.

    While holding the buyer's agreement terms biased in favour of the builder, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sanjeev Kumar Arora (Member), has directed the builder to pay interest to the homebuyer for the delay in handing over possession.

    Builder Fails To Provide Monthly Returns On Booked Unit, Haryana RERA Orders Refund To Complainant

    Case – Reena Devi & another Versus M/s Landmark Apartments Private Limited

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sanjeev Kumar Arora (Member), has directed the builder to refund the amount paid by the complainant for a unit in the commercial real estate project named Landmark Cyber Park, after the builder failed to pay the monthly return of Rs. 46,000.

    Haryana RERA Orders Builder BPTP To Pay Interest And Pass Benefit of Increased Super Built-Up Area To Homebuyer

    CaseLalit Kumar Versus BPTP Ltd.

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sanjeev Kumar Arora (Member), has directed the builder to pay interest for the delay in handing over possession and pass on the benefit of the increased super built-up area to the homebuyer without imposing additional costs in the total sale consideration.

    No Misrepresentation By Godrej Developers, Haryana RERA Refuses To Provide Refund Of Booking Amount To Homebuyer

    Case – Neeraj Singh Bhadouria & another Versus M/s Godrej Developers and Promoters LLP

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sanjeev Kumar Arora (Member), dismissed the homebuyer's allegation that Godrej Developers misrepresented their joint venture project as solely developed and marketed by them.

    Haryana RERA Orders Signature Global To Pay Interest To Homebuyer For Delayed Possession, Also Held Sale Agreement Biased

    Case – Kiran Kumar Versus M/s Signature Global (India) Pvt. Ltd.

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sanjeev Kumar Arora (Member), has directed Signature Global India Private Limited, the builder, to pay interest to the homebuyer for the delay in handing over possession.

    Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    Telangana RERA Orders Refund To Homebuyers And Imposes Penalty On Builder For Selling Unregistered Project

    Case – Sri Chowki Ramesh and another Versus M/s Parijatha Homes and Developments Pvt Ltd

    While hearing the complaint of two homebuyers related to the same real estate project, Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Justice Dr. N. Satyanarayana (Chairperson), K. Srinivasa Rao (Member), and Laxmi Narayana Jannu (Member), directed the builder to refund the amount paid by the homebuyers to purchase the flat.

    Telangana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal

    Government Of Telangana Establishes Real Estate Appellate Tribunal

    The Government of Telangana established the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (REAT) seven years after the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, came into force on May 1, 2017. The Telangana Government appointed Justice A. Rajasheker Reddy (retd) as chairperson, Pradeep Kumar Reddy Palle as judicial member, and Chitra Ramchandran as technical and administrative member of the Telangana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal.

    Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    Rajasthan RERA Directs Builders To Submit Detailed Architectural Drawings And Open Separate Bank Accounts

    No F1 (31) RJ/RERA/2019/ 687

    Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) has directed builders/promoters to submit architectural drawings while applying for a Completion Certificate/Occupancy Certificate and to open three separate bank accounts. These directives are based on decisions made during the Authority's 18th meeting held on June 7th.

    Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    Punjab RERA Orders Builder To Pay Interest To Homebuyer For Delayed Possession In The LAKE Project

    Case – Ashok Kumar and another Versus M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developments Pvt. Ltd.

    Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench consisting of Malwinder Singh Jaggi (Member), has directed the builder to pay interest to the homebuyer for the delay in handing over possession of the flat in a construction linked plan real estate project.

    Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    MahaRERA – Dispute Arising Out Of Development Agreement Is Not Maintainable

    Case - Pulin Co-Operative Housing Society Limited Versus Tirupati Developers

    Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Mahesh Pathak (Member), held that there is no provision in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, which empowers the authority to entertain disputes arising out of a development agreement, such disputes fall under the jurisdiction of the Civil court.

    MahaRERA Grants 4-Year Extension To RSM Homes To Complete Their Unimont Coral Project

    Citation - REGULATORY CASE NO. 225 OF 2024

    Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising of Ajoy Mehta (Chairperson), granted a 4-year extension to RSM Homes LLP Ltd for its Project Unimont Coral under Section 7(3) of the RERA 2016. In total, this is the fourth extension of the project, the other three extensions were granted by authority on the grounds of Covid-19 under Section 6 of RERA 2016.

    MahaRERA Orders Builder To Apply For Extension, Complete Construction Of Project, And Hand Over Possession To Homebuyers

    Case - Marvel Aquanas Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd Versus Marvel Realtors & Developers Limited and Others

    Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Ajoy Mehta (Chairperson), has directed the builder to apply for a Project extension, complete the construction, and hand over possession to the homebuyer.

    Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal

    MahaREAT Orders Builder To Pay Interest To Homebuyer For Delay In Providing Possession

    Case – Adv. Mr. Prashant M. Sane Versus M/s. vital Developers Private Ltd and another

    The bench of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal ('Tribunal'), comprising Justice Shriram R. Jagtap (Judicial Member) and Dr. K. Shivaji (Technical Member), has directed the builder to pay interest to the homebuyer for the delay in providing possession of the flat.

    Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    Tamil Nadu RERA Orders Refund To Homebuyer And Imposes Penalty On Builder For Selling Unregistered Project

    Case – V. Saravanan Versus M/s. Spring Field Shelters (P) Ltd.

    Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sunil Kumar (Member), directed the builder to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer to purchase the two villas.

    Tamil Nadu RERA Orders Refund To Homebuyer And Imposes Penalty On SAM Foundation For Selling Unregistered Project

    Case – D. Narayanasami Versus M/s. SAM Foundations & another

    Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sunil Kumar (Member), directed SAM Foundation, the builder, to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer for purchasing a flat in their project.


    Next Story