- Home
- /
- Top Stories
- /
- Rent, Lease Or Construct: SC Orders...
Rent, Lease Or Construct: SC Orders Delhi Govt To Ensure 167 Functional Additional Courtrooms By June/July 2020
Apoorva Mandhani
30 Nov 2018 8:07 PM IST
The Supreme Court, on Thursday, asserted that it was the “constitutional duty and responsibility” of the Government of NCT of Delhi to ensure that 167 additional court rooms are available when the newly appointed judges would be ready to start working by June/July, 2020.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice KM Joseph ordered that...
The Supreme Court, on Thursday, asserted that it was the “constitutional duty and responsibility” of the Government of NCT of Delhi to ensure that 167 additional court rooms are available when the newly appointed judges would be ready to start working by June/July, 2020.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice KM Joseph ordered that this should be done, if required, by taking suitable premises on rent or lease.
During the hearing, the court perused an affidavit filed by the Registrar General of Delhi High Court, who had stated that the advertisement for filling up 50 posts of Civil Judge Junior Division dated November 14, 2018 had been modified to increase the number of posts to 147.
The Registrar General had further submitted that he expects the process of appointment to be completed within a period of six and a half months from the date of advertisement, which would be sometime in June/July, 2019. Thereafter, the court was told, the selected officers will undergo mandatory training for one year and will be ready to commence court work sometime in June/July, 2020.
The court’s order dated November 15 had noted that to accommodate these officers and to make the court functional, Delhi would need an additional number of 167 court halls: 47 in Karkardooma Court Complex; 16 in Saket Court Complex; 64 in Dwarka Court Complex and 40 in Rohini Court Complex.
The order passed on November 15 had also rejected the time frame of October, 2021/December, 2021 for construction of the additional court premises, as submitted by the Delhi Government. The Delhi Government had therefore been asked to respond on the availability of infrastructure in this regard.
The affidavit by the Chief Secretary now submitted an alternative proposal of constructing 195 court halls in three different locations in the trans-yamuna areas. The tentative cost was submitted to be Rs.332 crore for the new construction, instead of modifying the existing court complexes.
Taking note of this submission, the court directed Delhi High Court to examine this proposal, observing, “We do not know what would be the stand of the High Court of Delhi with regard to the feasibility of the latest proposal suggested by the Government of NCT of Delhi, as indicated above, namely, whether allocation of the court in the new locations would be administratively feasible and possible.”
The bench further observed with dismay that the possibility of the Government of NCT of Delhi completing the constructions of new court halls by June/July 2020 (when the additional courts are expected to start functioning) “is remote”.
“Not to talk about commencement of construction and preparation of blue-print even the project is at the stage of mere conception and ideas are yet to fully develop,” it noted.
Reminding the Delhi Government of its constitutional duties and responsibilities, the court then ordered,
“In such circumstances, we would like to impress upon the Government of NCT of Delhi, at this stage, that it would be constitutional duty and responsibility to ensure that 167 additional court rooms are available, if required, by taking suitable premises on rent or lease so as to ensure that the additional courts start functioning when the officers to be recruited are available after completing training i.e. by June/July 2020.”
The Government of NCT of Delhi and the High Court has now been directed to submit their respective responses on or before December 12, and the matter will next be heard on December 13.
Read the Order