- Home
- /
- News Updates
- /
- Breaking: Satyendar Jain Moves...
Breaking: Satyendar Jain Moves Delhi High Court Against Transfer Of PMLA Proceedings To New Judge
Nupur Thapliyal
23 Sept 2022 1:40 PM IST
Aam Aadmi Party leader Satyendar Jain has moved the Delhi High Court challenging the transfer of proceedings against him in a money laundering proceedings being probed by the Enforcement Directorate from a Special Court to another judge, earlier today.A division bench comprising of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad allowed urgent mentioning of the matter by...
Aam Aadmi Party leader Satyendar Jain has moved the Delhi High Court challenging the transfer of proceedings against him in a money laundering proceedings being probed by the Enforcement Directorate from a Special Court to another judge, earlier today.
A division bench comprising of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad allowed urgent mentioning of the matter by Senior Advocate Rahul Mehra for Monday.
Earlier today, Principal District & Sessions Judge of Rouse Avenue Courts allowed an application moved by the probe agency seeking transfer of proceedings against Jain in the matter.
The case, which was earlier being heard by Special Judge Geetanjali Goel, has now been directed to be heard by Special Judge Vikas Dhull.
Mentioning the matter before High Court, Mehra submitted that there was urgency in the matter as only a week's time has been given for the new judge to decide the case, which is directed to be heard on a day to day basis, starting from today at 2 PM.
"The matter is to be heard on a day to day basis starting from today at 2 PM. There is an urgency….my right will become infructuous," said Mehra while requesting the matter to be listed on Monday.
About Impugned Order
Appearing for the agency, Additional Solicitor General SV Raju yesterday told the Court that having served as Minister of Health and Jails in the city, Jain could influence the doctors and jail authorities and manage to get forged documents while seeking interim bail on grounds ill health.
Raju had argued that Jain faked his illness and got himself admitted in a hospital, being administratively run by the Delhi Government.
Therefore, Raju said that the agency has an apprehension of bias against the Special Judge in deciding the matter, on the ground that despite bringing on record various documents to show that Jain was an influencing personality and documents may be forged in his favour, the Judge refused to consider the same.
Raju also submitted that even a common man would know that if a minister heading a hospital is admitted, there will be an element of bias as to how he will be examined in the said hospital.
On the othet hand, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appearing for Jain took the Court through the facts of the case by submitting that the issue arose after Jain moved a regular bail application before the Special Judge on August 17, having been denied the same once in June.
Calling the agency's application as a mala fide plea, Sibal said that no apprehension was put forth by ED before September 15 when the matter was being heard in its final stages.
Sibal also said that as per an official notification, Jain was not holding the ministerial position of any department anymore. He also said that merely because the hospital where Jain was admitted was under the adminstrative control of Delhi goverment is no ground to allege bias.
About the Case
After an ED's plea seeking transfer of the case from a Special Court, the Principal District & Sessions Judge on September 19 stayed the proceedings in the matter and posted the application for hearing on September 30.
However, after an urgent mentioning before the Supreme Court on Wednesday, the Principal District & Sessions Judge was directed to take up, hear and dispose of the plea by today itself.
ED had attached properties worth Rs. 4.81 crore belonging to five companies and others in connection with an alleged disproportionate assets case against Jain and others. These assets reportedly were in the name of Akinchan Developers, Indo Metal Impex, Paryas Infosolutions, Mangalayatan Projects and J.J. Ideal Estate etc.
The money laundering case is based upon an FIR registered by the CBI against the minister and other individuals in the year 2017, under the Prevention of Corruption Act, wherein it was alleged that during the period of February 2015 to May 2017, the minister had acquired assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. The CBI had then filed a chargesheet in December 2018 against Jain.
Presently, Jain is in judicial custody in the said money laundering case.