Top
News Updates

Delhi HC Issues Notice On Plea Challenging MCA Notification For Technical Member Post In NCLAT

Karan Tripathi
18 Feb 2020 5:41 AM GMT
Delhi HC Issues Notice On Plea Challenging MCA Notification For Technical Member Post In NCLAT
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
599+GST
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday issued notice in a plea challenging the notification of Ministry Of Corporate Affairs, inviting applications for the post of Technical Member of NCLAT.

The Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Hari Shankar has issued notice to the Central Government.

The Petitioner has challenged the notification dated 10/05/19 by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, inviting applications for appointment of Technical Member of NCLAT.

The said notification has called for persons who have at least 25 years of experience in law. The Petitioner has called such a requirement arbitrary and illegal.

It was submitted by the Petitioner that the said notification indirectly revives Section 411(3) of the Companies Act which was struck down by the Supreme Court.

Section 411(3) of the Companies Act laid down the qualifications for the appointment of the Technical Member. The provision had stipulated 25 years of experience in law as one of the qualifications for the said appointment.

The Petitioner, therefore, argues that MCA's notification dated 10/05/2019, defeats the rationale of having a Technical Member in NCLAT, which is to bring persons of technical expertise to the board.

It is further argued that such provisions work as a 'backdoor entry' to the board for those legal professionals who are otherwise not qualified to be appointed as judicial members under Section 411(2) of the Companies Act.

Therefore, the Petitioner has challenged the initiation and continuation of the appointment procedure of Technical Members under the said notification.

The petition has also sought a writ of quo warranto to be issued to those persons who have already been appointed under the said notification.

The court has adjourned the given matter till May 1.

Next Story