Withdrawal Of Resolution Plan Will Have Disastrous Effect: NCLAT

The Appellant filed the appeal before the NCLAT against the order dated 21.07.2022 passed by NCLT Indore which relying upon the judgment of Supreme Court in Ebix v. Educomp dismissed the application filed by Appellant seeking withdrawal of the resolution plan.

It was contended by the Appellant that the judgement of Ebix is not applicable as the same deals with the cases where the Corporate Debtor has undergone changes but in the present case, the Appellant is seeking withdrawal due to the financial difficulty being faced by the Appellant.

The Bench rejected the argument of the Appellant and held that even if the Appellant is allowed to withdraw from the plan due to financial difficulty, the same will amount to go back from the commitment made in the resolution plan which is not permissible.

"The IBC is process consists of different steps with a ultimate object of reviving the Corporate Debtor. Permitting Successful Resolution Applicant to withdraw after the Plan has been approved will have serious disastrous effect on whole purpose and object of IBC."

Accordingly, NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant and upheld the order of NCLT, Indore.

Case Title: Shardha Buildcon Pvt. Ltd v. The Dhar Textile Mills Ltd.

Counsel for Appellant: Mr. Nakul Dewan, Sr Adv with Neil Chatterjee, Mr. Rohan Naik

Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Abhirup Dasgupta, Mr. Ishaan Duggal & Ms. Bhawana Sharma

Click Here To Read/Download Order