"Summons To Advocate Representing His Client Impinges Upon The Stature Of An Advocate": Madras High Court

The contempt petition was filed by Mr. A Sankar on the ground that the respondent had not complied with the order of the Court dated 18.01.2019 directing the respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner. The petitioner had made representations to remove his name from the history sheet.

The court had made the above direction in line with the guidelines given in the decision of Sabari v. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madurai City and others (2018). The petitioner submitted that he had sent a legal notice to the respondent for contempt and upon receipt of the legal notice, a Summons was issued to the counsel representing the petitioner and to the petitioner himself.

The court further observed that the act of the respondent in sending summons to the petitioner was also not proper as it has been time and again held that a Summon can be issued only in the course of investigation after an FIR is registered under Section 154 of Cr.P.C. The court observed how there was no need for the respondent police to issue a summons and such issuance itself goes against the purport of the orders passed by the Court.

The Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the respondents will be instructed to withdraw the summons and send a personally written letter to the Advocate regretting for the mistake committed by him. The court took note of this submission and directed the respondent to report compliance before the court on the next posting.

The matter has been posted to 6^th June 2022 for reporting compliance.

Case Title: A. Sankar v. V. Kumar and others

Case No: Cont. Petition 818 of 2022