- Home
- /
- News Updates
- /
- Karnataka Assembly Passes Bill To...
Karnataka Assembly Passes Bill To Impose Restrictions On Religious Conversions & Inter-Faith Marriages
Mustafa Plumber
23 Dec 2021 5:22 PM IST
The Karnataka Legislative Assembly on Thursday passed the Karnataka Protection of Right To Freedom Of Religion Bill, 2021, which seeks to impose restrictions on religious conversions and inter-faith marriages. The bill was passed in a voice vote amid strong opposition from Congress and JD(S). The ruling BJP government had introduced the bill on Tuesday. What...
The Karnataka Legislative Assembly on Thursday passed the Karnataka Protection of Right To Freedom Of Religion Bill, 2021, which seeks to impose restrictions on religious conversions and inter-faith marriages. The bill was passed in a voice vote amid strong opposition from Congress and JD(S). The ruling BJP government had introduced the bill on Tuesday.
Religious conversion which is not done as per the procedure under the law is defined as "unlawful conversion". ​The Bill defines unlawful conversion through allurement to include offers of any temptation in form of any gift, gratification, easy money or material benefit either in cash or kind employment, free education in a reputed school run by any religions body; or promise to marry; or better lifestyle, divine displeasure or otherwise.
Importantly, the proposed law places the 'Burden of Proof' regarding lawful conversion on the person who has caused the conversion and where such conversion has been facilitated by any person on such person.
A detailed procedure to be followed has been laid down by which conversion is permitted. It is also notified that a declaration before conversion and pre-report about conversion shall be given in a prescribed form at least sixty days in advance to the District Magistrate or the Additional District Magistrate by a person who wishes to convert his religion on his free consent and without any force, coercion, undue influence or allurement.
It may be recalled that the Gujarat High Court had recently diluted similar provisions in the Gujarat anti-conversion law by declaring that the provisions will not apply to parties entering inter-faith marriage on free consent.
The High Court had made a prima-facie observation that the Gujarat law "interferes with the intricacies of marriage including the right to the choice of an individual, thereby infringing Article 21 of the Constitution of India".
Petitions have been filed in High Courts challenging similar laws passed by Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh as violative of the fundamental right to personal liberty and privacy.
Procedure for conversion
The religious converter who performs a conversion ceremony for converting any person of one religion to another religion shall give one month's advance notice in Form-II of such conversion, to the District Magistrate or any other officer not below the rank of Additional District Magistrate.
Contravention of any of the criteria shall have the effect of rendering the proposed conversion illegal and void. The persons who contravene the provisions shall be punished with imprisonment and also be liable for fine.
The bill also prescribes a procedure that is to be followed post-conversion. The contravention of the provisions laid down shall have the effect of rendering the said conversion illegal and void.
If any institution is found to have violated any of the provisions the person or persons in charge of the affairs of the organisation or the institution, as the case may be, shall be subject to punishment as provided under section 5 and the registration of such organisation or the institution under any law for the time being in force may be cancelled by the competent authority upon a reference made by the District Magistrate in this regard. The State Government shall not provide any financial aid or grant to such institution or organisation violating the provisions of this Act.
The statement of objects and reason refers to the judgement in the case of Rev Stanislaus vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Orissa (1977) 1 SCC 677 of the Supreme Court in which it is held that the Right to propagate under Article 25 does not include the right to convert another person.
The legislation states that "Whoever, contravenes the provisions of section 3 shall, without prejudice to any civil liability, be punished with imprisonment for a term, which shall not be less than three years but which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than Rupees twenty-five thousand."
Under the proposed legislation any aggrieved person, his parents, brother, sister or any other person who is related to him by blood, marriage or adoption may lodge a First Information Report of such conversion.
In respect of mass conversion, the offender shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three years but which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than Rupees one lakh.
