J&K Road Transport Corporation Employees Not Entitled To Pensionary Benefits: High Court

The ruling was pronounced in two appeals filed by the government challenging single bench judgment wherein the court held the writ petitioners entitled to all retiral benefits at par with and on the analogy of section of employees of Corporation who were earlier the employees of erstwhile Government Transport Undertaking (GTU) .

Setting aside single-judge verdict, a division bench comprising Justices Sanjeev Kumar and Wasim Sadiq Nargal observed that they do not uphold the view of the writ Court that the writ petitioners though appointed in the Corporation are entitled to retiral benefits like pension and gratuity.

"Having found the writ petitioners not similarly situated with the class of employees of the erstwhile GTU, who were given fresh opportunity to make option in the year 1986, we are convinced that the view of the Writ Court holding the writ petitioners entitled to pensionary benefits, more particularly when the JKSRTC Service Condition Rules and Regulations, 1979 applicable to the writ petitioners declare their service 'non-pensionable', is totally erroneous and unsustainable," the bench stated while allowing the appeals.

Deliberating on the matter court further stated that it cannot issue a mandamus to the Corporation to provide or not to provide a particular service benefit, this while taking note of the 1979 Regulations, whereby the employees appointed to the Corporation (Corporation borne employees) were not entitled to superannuation pension.

"They, however, are entitled to certain other post-retail benefits in lieu of pension," the court stated.

The bench further underscored that the Corporation is also free if it so chooses to provide any service benefits to its employees including pension by acting strictly within the mandate of the Central Road Transport Corporation Act 1950 and rules and regulations framed thereunder by the Corporation.

"We, however, do not countenance the issuance of writ of mandamus to the official respondents to necessarily concede the request of the Corporation, nor do we uphold the view of the writ Court that the writ petitioners though appointed in the Corporation and by the Corporation are entitled to retiral benefits like pension and gratuity on a par with the government employees serving in other Government Departments," the court stated during the judgment.

Accordingly, the appeal was also allowed and judgment of the Writ Court was set aside.

Case Title : UT of J&K & Ors V/s All J&K Workers Union SRTC and another J&K Road Transport Employees Association & Anr.

Citation : 2022 LiveLaw (JKL) 216