Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: September 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 292 To 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 330 NOMINAL INDEX Darogi & Ors. v Chetram & Ors; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 292 M/s Subhash Chand Mukesh Chand v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 Live Law (Raj) 293 Bank of Baroda v U.N Automobiles Pvt Ltd.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 294 Kanchan Patil (Mirasi) Samaj v State of Rajasthan; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 295 Smt. Kamla Khinchi v Smt. Kamla & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 296 Ashok Kumar & Anr. v Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 297 Kishan Lal Sharma & Ors. v Laxmi India Fineleasecap Pvt Ltd; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 298 X v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 299 State of Rajasthan v Mohanlal Alias Sukhram; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 300 Meetu Pareek & Anr. v State of Rajasthan; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 301 Dr. Varsha Sharma v Joint Director & Anr.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 302 Sitaram v State of Rajasthan & Anr.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 303 Sunita Devi v Sumit Bishnoi, and other connected petition; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 304 Aayush Narania v State of Rajasthan & Ors., and other connected petitions; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 305 Smt. Pooja v Mahendra Singh & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 306 Master Daivik Rangwani v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 307 IDP Education Indian Pvt. Ltd. v Union of India & Ors. and other connected petitions; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 308 Padam Kumar Jain v Bank of Maharashtra; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 309 Shaitan Ram v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 310 Mohammad Salim v State of Rajasthan & Ors., and other connected petitions; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 311 State of Rajasthan & Ors. v Dr. Ali Taqi & Ors., and other connected petitions; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 312 M/s Sahil Steels v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 313 Sangam Chaudhary v the State of Rajasthan & Anr, and other connected petitions; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 314 Sabuddin & Ors. v Giriraj; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 315 LBS Convent School v CBSE and other connected petitions; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 316 Pushkar Naraian Sharma v Union of India & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 317 Rajmal v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 318 Akash v State of Rajasthan; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 319 Shwetabh Singhal v M/s Jk and Sons & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 320 Shree Arihant Oil and General Mills v. Union Of India; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 321 Divya Kumar v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 322 Narendra Singh v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 323 Smt. Mishri Devi v Director, Pension and Pensioners Welfare Department Pension Bhawan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 324 Abhishek Shah v Rajasthan Staff Selection Board & Ors., and other connected petitions; 2025 Live Law (Raj) 325 Smt. Imarti Devi & Ors. v Nattha Ram & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 326 Girdhar Gopal v Sanwarmal Sharma & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 327 Ramswaroop Bhati v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 328 Mala Ram & Anr. v State of Rajasthan & Ors., and other connected petitions; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 329 Bank of India v Paras Talkies & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 330 Vyas Dental College and Hospital v Rajasthan University of Health Sciences & Ors. Kuldeep Singh v State of Rajasthan Bhagirath Singh Chauhan v Bar Council of India Amar Singh v State of Rajasthan and other connected appeals Shah Rukh Khan v/s The State Of Rajasthan and anr. and Batch Vivek Firoda v Rajasthan High Court through its Registrar General and Anr. Ashok Kumar Bhargava v Mahaveer Ranka Priyansha Gupta v Union of India Smt. Urmila Agarwal v. State of Rajasthan Himanshu v State of Rajasthan Tax Bar Association, Bhilwara v UOI & Anr. Puran Chander Sen v. The State of Rajasthan and Others Orders/Judgments of the Month Not Providing Separate Findings On Every Issue Framed For Trial Violates Statutory Provisions Under CPC: Rajasthan High Court Title: Darogi & Ors. v Chetram & Ors. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 292 The Rajasthan High Court has set aside a Trial Court order wherein despite framing issues in the matter, no categorical issue-wise findings were recorded, and the judgment was given by recording a consolidated finding. While underscoring the significance of the steps of framing of issues and terming the matter as “quite shocking and surprising”, the bench of Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand observed that the judgment did not stand the judicial scrutiny as it was in complete violation of the mandatory provisions of Order XX Rule 5 and Order XIV Rule 2, CPC. Order XX, Rule 5, CPC and Order XIV, Rule 2, CPC, provides that the Court is to pronounce its decision on each issue. 'Disputed' Water Bodies Are To Be Identified By Experts, Mere Revenue Record Entries Not Enough For Verification: Rajasthan High Court Title: M/s Subhash Chand Mukesh Chand v State of Rajasthan & Ors. Citation: 2025 Live Law (Raj) 293 The Rajasthan High Court held that identification and protection of disputed water bodies required...

Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: September 2025

Nupur Agrawal

Tags