- Home
- /
- High Courts
- /
- Delhi High Court
- /
- Delhi High Court Monthly Digest:...
Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: August 2024 [Citations 863 - 955]
Nupur Thapliyal
14 Sept 2024 7:36 PM IST
Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 863 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 955NOMINAL INDEXVANDANA v. STATE THROUGH SHO PS AMAR COLONY & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 863ANASTASIIA PIVTSAEVA & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 864COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. STATE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 865MR CHIRAGUDDIN v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 866Mitsubishi Corporation Versus...
Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 863 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 955
NOMINAL INDEX
VANDANA v. STATE THROUGH SHO PS AMAR COLONY & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 863
ANASTASIIA PIVTSAEVA & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 864
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. STATE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 865
MR CHIRAGUDDIN v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 866
Mitsubishi Corporation Versus ACIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 867
A v. B 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 868
M/S Plus91 Security Solutions Vs Nec Corporation India Private Limited (Erstwhile Nec Technologies Private Limited) 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 869
SUMAN VIJAY v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 870
ANJANA GOSAIN v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT AND ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 871
Bibhav Kumar v. State 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 872
Kutumb v. State & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 873
P v. State & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 874
SANCHIT GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 875
Maruti Traders vs Itron India Pvt Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 876
PIO, RP CELL, SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION v. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 877
Rohit Pradhan v. High Court & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 878
The Associated Chambers Of Commerce And Industry Of India Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 879
Falcon Autotech Private Limited vs. Kengic Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd. (2024 LiveLaw (Del) 880
Puja Khedkar v. UPSC & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 881
YUVRAJ SINGH BUNDHEL v. M/S BRILLIANT ETOILE PRIVATE LIMITEDm2024 LiveLaw (Del) 882
RAZIA SULTAN v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 883
Banyan Real Estate Fund Mauritius Verses Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle International Tax 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 884
FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR and other connected matters 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 885
Anuj Malhotra v. GNCTD & Ors.m2024 LiveLaw (Del) 886
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI v. PURAN SINGH 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 887
Abdul Wahid Alias Saddam vs. National Investigation Agency 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 888
BIBI SABERA v. MAJOR DR. CHANDRA SHEKHAR PANT@ HIMMAT KHAN 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 889
SHRI RAJESH CHUGH v. MEHRUDDIN ANSARI & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 890
M/S A P Enterprises Versus Sales Tax Officer 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 891
Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited Versus ACIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 892
SUNDARI GAUTAM v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 893
Tosca Master vs. Deputy CIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 894
Akash Poddar Versus ACIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 895
Puja Khedkar v. State 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 896
Himanshu and Ors vs. Directorate General of Civil Aviation & Anr 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 897
M/S S. K. BUILDERS versus M/S CLS CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 898
SHAZIA ILMI v. RAJDEEP SARDESAI & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 899
Nandita v. NTA 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 900
RUCHI WADHAWAN VERSUS AMIT WALI 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 901
Kamal Bhasin Vs. Central Public Information Office & And 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 902
SAHIL v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 903
Scope Promoters P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax Delhi & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 904
Ramesh Chawla Versus ITO 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 905
Genpact Luxembourg S.A.R.L. vs. ACIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 906
Sh. Venumbaka Vijaya Sai Reddy Vs. Aamoda Publications Private Limited & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 907
Ravi Kumar Sinha vs. CIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 908
Index Hospitality Limited Vs Contitel Hotels And Resorts Pvt Ltd & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 909
Vinod Kumar Solanki vs. ACIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 910
Smriti Bhatia cs. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 911
BAJRANGPUNIA & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 912
Shree Bhavani Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 913
AMIT MALVIYA v. SAMAJWADI PARTY MEDIA CELL & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 914
ANTHONY WATTS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 915
Maj Gen Vinayak Saini Sm Vsm vs. Union Of India Through & Ors. (W.P.(C) 7181/2024) 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 916
Vedanta Limited Versus ACIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 917
Shree Bhavani Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 918
JagatMitra Foundation v Union of India through the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 919
SBC Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 920
JCB INDIA LIMITED AND ANR v. THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 921
Honasa Consumer Limited Vs Rsm General Trading Llc 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 922
RESILIENT INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASHNEER GROVER 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 923
M/S Chinar Steel Industries Vs Ircon International Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 924
MOHAMMED ZUBAIR v. STATE OF GNCT & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 925
Amit Jain vs. Sanjeev Kumar Singh & Anr (Crl.A. 1248/2019) 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 926
GUNJAN AS GUARDIAN OF PIHU v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. and other connected matters 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 927
ESS Singapore Branch Versus DCIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 928
Raj Kumari Taneja Vs Rajinder Kumar & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 929
Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. Vs Paramount Communications Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 930
MRS C v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 931
The Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) vs A K Jain 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 932
ANKUSH & ANR. v. STATE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 933
STATE v. MOHIT KUMAR & ANR 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 934
Manhar Sabharwal vs. High Court Of Delhi & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 935
Resident Welfare Association vs. Kishan Devnani and Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 936
MASTER JAI KUMAR THROUGH HIS FATHER MANISH KUMAR v. AADHARSHILA VIDYA PEETH & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 937
LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER v. WWW.HAUTE24.COM & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 938
Dr. Rahul Bhayana Vs Dr. Rohit Bhayana & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 939
Mr. Sandip Vinodkumar Patel & Ors. Vs Stci Finance Ltd., & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 940
MUKESH KUMAR SEN v. STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 941
M/S Hotel Marina & Anr Vs Vibha Mehta 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 942
G.D. PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S CENTO PRODUCTS (INDIA)2024 LiveLaw (Del) 943
Aptec Advanced Protective Technologies Ag Vs Union Of India & Anr 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 944
CA RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA v. DELHI HIGH COURT THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 945
Kunal Food Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs Delhi Development Authority 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 946
GANTAVYA GULATI v. UNION OF INDIA 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 947
M/S Kamladityya Construction Pvt Ltd VS Rail Land Development Authority 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 948
RAJNEESH v. UNION OF INDIA 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 949
Shashi Tharoor v. State 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 950
SMT. SANTOSH TYAGI v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 951
TIGER GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL III HOLDINGS Vs THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOMETAX) & ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 952
GOVIND YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 953
MOHIT JITENDRA KUKADIA v. UNION OF INDIA 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 954
THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ANR. v. SYNDICATE INNOVATIONS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 955
Title: VANDANA v. STATE THROUGH SHO PS AMAR COLONY & ANR.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 863
The Delhi High Court has observed that the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), in a habeas corpus petition involving exceptional circumstances, can be directed to provide the Aadhar data about a missing person, even without being afforded a prior hearing.
A division bench headed by Justice Prathiba M Singh observed that in a habeas corpus case, there is a sense of urgency with which the Court has to act as the missing person could be in danger.
Title: ANASTASIIA PIVTSAEVA & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 864
The Delhi High Court has recently held that mere familial relationship with an accused, without evidence of direct involvement in the alleged crime, is no ground to deny security clearance to a spouse for Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) registration.
“Mere association or familial relationship with an accused, without concrete evidence of direct involvement or complicity in the alleged crimes, does not substantiate the grounds for denying security clearance under Section 7A(1)(d) of the Citizenship Act and neither does it withstand the test of arbitrariness and reasonableness under Article 14 of the Constitution,” Justice Sanjeev Narula said.
Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. STATE
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 865
The Delhi High Court has called for finalization of the technical solution to sync the Inter-operable Criminal Justice System (ICJS) system, which stores case data, with the criminal database of the Police, to avoid any discrepancies.
Title: MR CHIRAGUDDIN v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 866
While quashing a 2014 case registered against a man for allegedly sending obscene messages to a woman after settlement with her, the Delhi High Court has recently directed the man to do community service for three months in order to “atone for his sins.”
Justice Subramonium Prasad directed the man to do one month of community service each in an old age home, LNJP hospital and an orphanage respectively, from September 09 to November 30.
Case Title: Mitsubishi Corporation Versus ACIT
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 867
The Delhi High Court has held that the assessing officer (AO) cannot disregard the direction of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) to re-examine the issue by referring to the circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT).
Title: A v. B
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 868
The Delhi High Court has ruled that a child is entitled to maintenance under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, till the time he is pursuing his education and does not become financially independent.
“In our considered view, a child who is pursuing his education would be entitled to maintenance under Section 26 of the HMA even after he attains the age of majority, till the time he is pursuing his education and is not financially independent,” a division bench of Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Justice Amit Bansal said.
Case Title: M/S Plus91 Security Solutions Vs Nec Corporation India Private Limited (Erstwhile Nec Technologies Private Limited)
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 869
The Delhi High Court division bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju has held that an Arbitral Tribunal's decision to award damages for loss of profit is vitiated by patent illegality if it contradicts the express terms of the agreement between the parties.
Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Teacher For Slapping 3-Yr-Old Who Failed To Recite 'ABCD'
Title: SUMAN VIJAY v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 870
The Delhi High Court has recently quashed an FIR against a teacher who allegedly slapped a three-year-old child who failed to recite “ABCD” after the parties entered into a settlement.
Quashing the FIR filed by the minor's mother in 2015, Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta said that the complainant and the teacher intend to put a quietus to the case which arose over a “minor issue” and has been pending for a period of 9 years.
Title: ANJANA GOSAIN v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT AND ANR.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 871
The Delhi High Court has observed that uploading of fee bills of government empaneled lawyers on the Online Single Window System (OSWS) portal set up by the Delhi Government should be made smooth and without any glitches.
Delhi High Court Upholds Bibhav Kumar's Arrest In Alleged AAP MP Swati Maliwal Assault Case
Title: Bibhav Kumar v. State
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 872
The Delhi High Court has upheld the arrest of Chief Minister's close aide Bibhav Kumar in the alleged AAP MP Swati Maliwal assault case.
Justice Neena Bansal Krishna rejected the plea filed by Kumar.
Delhi High Court Orders CBI To Probe Death Of Three Civil Aspirants In Coaching Centre Tragedy
Title: Kutumb v. State & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 873
The Delhi High Court has ordered Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe the deaths of three civil services aspirants due to drowning in a IAS coaching centre basement in Rajendra Nagar.
A division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela passed the direction looking at the “seriousness of incident and that it may involve corruption by public servants.”
Title: P v. State & Anr.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 874
The Delhi High Court has upheld a trial court order accepting the cancellation report filed by the Delhi Police last year in a rape case filed against BJP leader and former Union Minister Syed Shahnawaz Hussain.
'X' Corp Does Not Perform 'Public Function', Not Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court
Title: SANCHIT GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 875
The Delhi High Court has recently ruled that X Corp, formerly Twitter, does not perform “public function” or discharges public duty and is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Justice Sanjeev Narula said that the social media platform operates as a “private entity” under “private law” and does not carry out any governmental duties or obligations.
Case Title: Maruti Traders vs Itron India Pvt Ltd
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 876
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice C Hari Shankar has held that commerce is devoid of equity. The bench held that commercial transactions are driven by a harsh reality, and the principle of universal brotherhood does not extend to commercial dealings. In these transactions, there is no obligation on the arbitrator for fairness, kindness, or equity, and no court can mandate such qualities.
Title: PIO, RP CELL, SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION v. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ANR.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 877
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the compensation awarded by Central Information Commission (CIC) under the Right to Information Act, 2005, has to directly correlate with the personal detriment experienced by the complainant.
“Thus, while the CIC possesses the authority to award compensation to information seeker, it is imperative that such compensation directly correlates with the personal detriment experienced by the complainant…,” Justice Sanjeev Narula said.
Delhi High Court Asks Registrar General To Decide Plea For Increasing E-Filing Size Limit
Title: Rohit Pradhan v. High Court & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 878
The Delhi High Court has directed its Registrar General to decide a representation seeking increase in the e-filing size of documents to be filed before the Delhi High Court as well as district courts in the national capital.
Case Title: The Associated Chambers Of Commerce And Industry Of India Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 879
The Delhi High Court has held that the assessee to be eligible and entitled to exemptions under Section 11(1) and 11(2) of the Income Tax Act and the alleged ground of non-filing of audit report along with return of income, which was at the best procedural omission, could never be an impediment in law in claiming the exemption.
Case title: Falcon Autotech Private Limited vs. Kengic Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd. (I.A. No. 35231/2024)
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 880
The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte interim injunction against a Chinese warehouse automation company from manufacturing, selling, importing or exporting pre-sortation machines in India that are patented by an Indian company.
A single bench of Justice Mini Pushkarna was considering the application of Falcon Autotech Private Limited, an Indian company, under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC, for an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against Kengic Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd, a Chinese company.
Title: Puja Khedkar v. UPSC & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 881
The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) informed the Delhi High Court on Wednesday that it will communicate to former probationer IAS officer Puja Khedkar within two days the official order cancelling her candidature.
Title: YUVRAJ SINGH BUNDHEL v. M/S BRILLIANT ETOILE PRIVATE LIMITED
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 882
The Delhi High Court has appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between Cricketer Yuvraj Singh and a developer over alleged violation of his privacy rights while promoting a real estate project and failure to adhere to the timeline for delivery of possession of an apartment in the project in the national capital.
Railways Must Ensure Prompt, Effective Complaint Resolution Mechanism: Delhi High Court
Title: RAZIA SULTAN v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 883
The Delhi High Court has observed that railways must ensure prompt, effective and structured complaint resolution mechanism for smooth and proper functioning of public transportation.
Case Title: Banyan Real Estate Fund Mauritius Verses Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle International Tax
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 884
The Delhi High Court held that a decision to reopen or reassess cannot be based or sought to be justified either on additional reasons or those which may be supplied subsequently while disposing of objections preferred by an assessee.
Title: FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR and other connected matters
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 885
The Delhi High Court has observed that the Entertainment Tax Act does not contain a mechanism for assessing and collecting tax on sponsorships.
High Court Directs Delhi Govt To Inspect Toilets In All Jails, Orders Renovation Within Four Months
Title: Anuj Malhotra v. GNCTD & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 886
The Delhi High Court has directed the Public Works Department (PWD) of Delhi Government to conduct inspection regarding the conditions of washrooms and toilets in all jail complexes in the national capital.
Title: STATE OF NCT OF DELHI v. PURAN SINGH
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 887
The Delhi High Court has reiterated that an FIR has to be mandatorily registered whenever a person dies in a police encounter which is alleged to be fake.
Case title: Abdul Wahid Alias Saddam vs. National Investigation Agency
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 888
The Delhi High Court denied bail to an accused who has been in jail for two years, considering the seriousness of the UAPA charges related to circulating fake Indian currency.
Title: BIBI SABERA v. MAJOR DR. CHANDRA SHEKHAR PANT@ HIMMAT KHAN
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 889
The Delhi High Court has recently ruled that a woman being a foreign national can have a “shared household” with another person holding Indian citizenship regardless of her visa status under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Title: SHRI RAJESH CHUGH v. MEHRUDDIN ANSARI & ANR.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 890
The Delhi High Court has recently ordered cancellation of a trademark registered in favour of a food outlet “Andaaz-e-Nizaam” in city's Nizamuddin area after a case was filed by an Indian restaurant chain “Nizam's”.
GST Registration Can't Be Cancelled On Unspecific Show Cause Notice: Delhi High Court
Case Title: M/S A P Enterprises Versus Sales Tax Officer
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 891
The Delhi High Court has held that the GST registration cannot be cancelled on cryptic allegations and on the basis of the Show Cause Notice, which did not state any specific allegation, which could be explained by the taxpayer.
Resolution Plan Approved Under IBC, Income Tax Reassessment Not Sustainable: Delhi High Court
Case Title: Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited Versus ACIT
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 892
The Delhi High Court has quashed the income tax assessment order and held that the statutory injunct which would operate in respect of any claim which may pertain to a period prior to the Resolution Plan being approved.
Title: SUNDARI GAUTAM v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 893
The Delhi High Court on Friday held that the offences of penetrative sexual assault and aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act are offences regardless of the gender of the offender and can be invoked against a woman also.
Case Title: Tosca Master vs. Deputy CIT
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 894
Finding major flaw in the fundamental premise of the Revenue Department that the investment made by the taxpayer in shares amounted to “income” which has escaped assessment, the Delhi High Court quashed the reopening proceeding initiated u/s 148A.
Case Title: Akash Poddar Versus ACIT
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 895
The Delhi High Court has held that the settlement consideration is liable to be recognized as capital gains and not “profits in lieu of salary.”.
Title: Puja Khedkar v. State
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 896
The Delhi High Court has granted interim protection from arrest till August 21 to former probationer IAS officer Puja Khedkar who is accused of “misrepresenting and falsifying facts" in her application for Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) Civil Services Examination, 2022. The interim protection continues till date.
Case title: Himanshu and Ors vs. Directorate General of Civil Aviation & Anr
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 897
The Delhi High Court observed that the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), as an expert authority under the Aircraft Act, 1934 and Aircraft Rules, 1937, has the statutory mandate to classify aircrafts based on technical specifications for safety and regulatory compliance
Non-Response Can't Be Presumed As Consent For Appointment Of Arbitrator: Delhi High Court
Case Title: M/S S. K. BUILDERS versus M/S CLS CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 898
The Delhi High Court bench of J. C.Hari Shankar has held that consent requires consensus ad idem and there must be positive consent present from the petitioner side with respect to the appointment of an arbitrator. If such consent is absent, the appointment becomes unilateral and ex facie illegal.
Title: SHAZIA ILMI v. RAJDEEP SARDESAI & ORS.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 899
Delhi High Court has directed journalist Rajdeep Sardesai to take down a video posted by him on 'X', alleging that BJP leader Shazia Ilmi abused a video journalist of India Today during a televised debate.
The controversy arose after Ilmi took part in a debate on India Today news channel last month on Agniveer scheme row. However, she left the debate midway claiming that her mic was cut-off with an intent to censor her.
Case Title: Nandita v. NTA
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 900
The Delhi High Court has dismissed the appeal preferred by a medical aspirant, challenging two questions in the Botany paper of the recently conducted NEET-UG examination.
Difficult To Digest That Divorce Would Be "Stigmatic" When Parties Are Educated : Delhi High Court
Case Details: RUCHI WADHAWAN VERSUS AMIT WALI
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 901
While allowing a wife's plea seeking divorce on the ground of mental cruelty, the Delhi High Court has rejected the husband's contention that the grant of divorce would bring “dishonour” and “stigma” upon himself and his family.
Case title: Kamal Bhasin Vs. Central Public Information Office & And
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 902
The Delhi High Court has held that withholding the names of the institutes or universities attended by current employees of a public authority is justified under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act). This is because disclosure of such information does not serve a broader public interest and further infringes on individual's privacy.
Title: SAHIL v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 903
The Delhi High Court has observed that POCSO Act is being “misapplied” as cases are being filed at the behest of the girl's family who object to her “friendship and romantic involvement” with a young boy.
SCN Lacks Reason For Proposing GST Registration Cancellation: Delhi High Court Revokes Cancellation
Case Title: Scope Promoters P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax Delhi & Anr.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 904
The Delhi High Court has revoked the GST registration cancellation on the grounds that the show cause notice lacked the reason for proposing to cancel the petitioner's GST registration. It merely stated that proceedings for cancellation of the GST registration have been initiated.
Case Title: Ramesh Chawla Versus ITO
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 905
The Delhi High Court has held that the failure or inability of the department to frame a fresh assessment should not place the assessee in a more disadvantageous position than in what he would have been if a fresh assessment was made.
Case Title: Genpact Luxembourg S.A.R.L. vs. ACIT
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 906
The Delhi High Court has quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated against the Assessee on the ground that interest income on Nonconvertible debentures (NCDs) derived from Indian AE had been mischaracterized as interest instead of dividend.
Case title: Sh. Venumbaka Vijaya Sai Reddy Vs. Aamoda Publications Private Limited & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 907
In an interim order, the Delhi High Court has directed news channels and digital media platforms to take down videos and posts alleging that Vijaya Sai Reddy, Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament for Andhra Pradesh, was involved in an extra-marital affair.
Case Title: Ravi Kumar Sinha vs. CIT
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 908
While emphasizing that no tax can be levied on notional income, the Delhi High Court held that Valuation Report obtained by employer could have no application to a share which was subject to a lock-in stipulation and could not be sold in the open market.
Case Title: Index Hospitality Limited Vs Contitel Hotels And Resorts Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 909
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Dharmesh Sharmab has held that breaches of undertakings given before a Court, or an Arbitral Tribunal should not be pursued under the Contempt of Courts Act. Instead, the High Court held that proper course of action is to seek enforcement of the arbitral award.
Case Title: Vinod Kumar Solanki vs. ACIT
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 910
Finding that the order of sanction passed by the Competent Authority is a general order of approval for 111 cases, and there was not even a whisper as to what material had weighed in the grant of approval u/s 151, the Delhi High Court held that although the PCIT is not required to record elaborate reasons, he must record satisfaction after application of mind.
Case title: Smriti Bhatia cs. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 911
The Delhi High Court disapproved the conduct of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) for failing to take any effective actions against unauthorised constructions, despite having issued a demolition order against such illegal constructions.
Title: BAJRANGPUNIA & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 912
The Delhi High Court has restored the mandate of the ad-hoc committee appointed by the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) on December 27 last year for overseeing and taking over all the activities and management of Wrestling Federation of India (WFI).
Case Title: Shree Bhavani Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 913
The Delhi High Court has held that the assessee was entitled to claim deductions even where the audit report had not been filed with the return but was submitted before the assessment was completed.
Title: AMIT MALVIYA v. SAMAJWADI PARTY MEDIA CELL & ORS.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 914
The Delhi High Court has ordered removal and take down of a tweet posted by Samajwadi Party's Media Cell on X Corp, formerly Twitter, accusing BJP IT Cell head Amit Malviya of sexual misconduct.
Delhi High Court Nod To Transfer Mortal Remains Of Man From UK, Notes Discrepancy In Consular Rules
Title: ANTHONY WATTS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 915
The Delhi High Court has given nod for the transfer of mortal remains of a Hyderabad based man who died at Chertsey, United Kingdom last month.
Case title: Maj Gen Vinayak Saini Sm Vsm vs. Union Of India Through & Ors. (W.P.(C) 7181/2024)
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 916
The Delhi High Court has observed that the Central Government's refusal to reconsider the promotion of an Indian army officer, despite finding that the officer's Confidential Report (CR) had been incorrectly downgraded by the Initiating Officer (IO), was arbitrary and illegal.
Case Title: Vedanta Limited Versus ACIT
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 917
The Delhi High Court has quashed the reassessment order and held that the amount paid for obtaining mining rights in e-auctions cannot be construed as income.
The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju has observed that the Department of Mines and Geology had merely provided to the AO the total amount paid by the petitioner for obtaining mining rights in the e-auctions that were conducted.
Case Title: Shree Bhavani Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 918
The Delhi High Court has held that the deduction under Section 80-IA(7) of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied for the mere failure of the assessee to digitally file an audit report.
The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Ravinder Dudeja has observed that Audit Report was duly furnished to the AO and was available to be scrutinised and examined by that authority during the assessment proceedings, the provisions of Section 80-IA(7), as it stood prior to the amendments introduced in 2020, would be recognized to have been substantially fulfilled.
Case title: JagatMitra Foundation v Union of India through the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 919
The Delhi High Court has directed the Centre to treat as a representation a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition seeking immediate action against the "illegal online sale of hookahs" on e-commerce platforms without specific health warnings.
During the hearing a division bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela orally said to the counsel appearing for the Centre, "He (petitioner) is highlighting a very important point. You must decide it. He is saying that the field is covered by a statutory provision. It is not being implemented. Which is the implementing agency. You must lay down a standard of procedure".
Word 'Approved' By PCCIT For Reopening Of Assessment Not Enough, Reasons Necessary, Delhi High Court
Case Title: SBC Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 920
The Delhi High Court has held that mere appending of the word “approved” by the PCCIT while granting approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act to the reopening under Section 148 is not enough.
Title: JCB INDIA LIMITED AND ANR v. THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 921
The Delhi High Court has recently observed that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) must honour the outcomes of mediation and respect the settlements reached between the parties.
A division bench comprising of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma said regulatory authorities such as the CCI are no exception to mediation process and settlements.
Case Title: Honasa Consumer Limited Vs Rsm General Trading Llc
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 922
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice C. Hari Shankar has held that when proceedings in a foreign court, or a decree issued by a foreign court, threaten the arbitral process that may be initiated in India, the court has the authority under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to restrain the party from continuing with the foreign proceedings or enforcing the potentially prejudicial decree.
Delhi High Court Refers Employment Agreement Dispute Between BharatPe, Ashneer Grover To Arbitration
Title: RESILIENT INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASHNEER GROVER
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 923
The Delhi High Court has referred to arbitration the dispute between former Managing Director of BharatPe, Ashneer Grover, and the fintech company concerning an employment agreement entered between them in August 2021.
Case Title: M/S Chinar Steel Industries Vs Ircon International Limited
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 924
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Prateek Jalan has held that time limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is not applicable to arbitral proceedings “commenced” as per Section 21 prior to 2015 amendment.
Case Title: MOHAMMED ZUBAIR v. STATE OF GNCT & ORS.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 925
The Delhi High Court has directed a man named Jagdish Singh to put an apology on X Corp, formerly Twitter, for posting an “offensive tweet” against Alt News co founder Mohammed Zubair by calling him a “jihadi” in 2020.
Case Title: Amit Jain vs. Sanjeev Kumar Singh & Anr (Crl.A. 1248/2019)
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 926
While hearing a matter on cheque bounce under the Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act, the Delhi High Court recently said that it would be prudent for courts to acknowledge that friendly cash loans are provided between parties without an existing document trail, with accused often getting acquitted because the complainant is unable to prove the existence of a debt.
Title: GUNJAN AS GUARDIAN OF PIHU v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. and other connected matters
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 927
The Delhi High Court has issued a slew of directions to ensure “respectful and accessible” admissions of students in all private unaided recognized schools under the EWS/DG category in the national capital.
Justice Swarana Kanta also directed all the stakeholders to ensure that there is a seamless merger of EWS and non-EWS students in the schools, as per the spirit of Right to Education Act.
AO Ought To Grant TDS Credit In Compliance Of ITAT's Directions: Delhi High Court
Case Title: ESS Singapore Branch Versus DCIT
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 928
The Delhi High Court has held that the Assessing Officer (AO) ought to grant TDS credit in compliance with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's (ITAT's) directions.
Case Title: Raj Kumari Taneja Vs Rajinder Kumar & Anr.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 929
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice C. Hari Shankar has held when a Court exercises jurisdiction under Section 11(5) or Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, it has to only ensure the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties and to confirm that the petition under these sections has been filed within three years of the service of a Section 21 notice.
Case Title: Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. Vs Paramount Communications Ltd
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 930
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Prateek Jalan has held that a dispute regarding excise duty is only non-arbitrable when it involves a sovereign function, such as determining tax liability or the rate at which duty must be paid to revenue authorities.
Delhi High Court Allows Medical Termination Of Pregnancy For Woman In Live-In-Relationship
Title: MRS C v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 931
The Delhi High Court has recently permitted a 27-year-old woman, a single mother abandoned by her husband, to undergo medical termination of a 22-week pregnancy arising from a live-in relationship.
Case title: The Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) vs A K Jain
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 932
The Delhi High Court observed that the absence of explicit prohibition on third parties from accessing information related to proceedings under the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 as a gap in the regulatory framework and this the Regulations should be interpreted in line with the RTI Act's goal of enhancing transparency.
Title: ANKUSH & ANR. v. STATE
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 933
The Delhi High Court has recently observed that Courts cannot be silent spectators or loudspeakers to echo whatever has been presented before them in the chargesheet.
Delhi High Court Convicts Two Men In Head Injury Case After 15 Years
Title: STATE v. MOHIT KUMAR & ANR
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 934
The Delhi High Court has recently overturned acquittal of two men and convicted them after over 15 years for intentionally inflicting injury on a man's head with a sharp object that could have resulted in his death.
Case title: Manhar Sabharwal vs. High Court Of Delhi & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 935
The Delhi High Court has upheld the constitutionality of Rule 4, Chapter VII of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018, which mandates that a written statement has to be filed within 120 days, including in non-commercial matters.
Case title: Resident Welfare Association vs. Kishan Devnani and Ors.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 936
The Delhi High Court has observed that a writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, which alleges encroachment on government land, cannot be entertained if it requires the court to conduct a 'roving or fishing enquiry' into disputed facts of the case.
Title: MASTER JAI KUMAR THROUGH HIS FATHER MANISH KUMAR v. AADHARSHILA VIDYA PEETH & ORS.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 937
The Delhi High Court has observed that denial of admission to any child once allotment of seat is done by the Directorate of Education (DoE) would be in violation of the objectives which the Right to Education Act seeks to achieve.
Title: LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER v. WWW.HAUTE24.COM & ORS.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 938
The Delhi High Court has recently ordered Rs. 5 lakhs as costs in favour of famous French luxury brand Louis Vuitton in its suit against a website for use of its photographs without authorization.
Case Title: Dr. Rahul Bhayana Vs Dr. Rohit Bhayana & Anr.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 939
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice C. Hari Shankar has held that issues such as allegations of fraud and claims that the applicant's claims are time-barred must be addressed by the arbitral tribunal rather than the court.
Case Title: Mr. Sandip Vinodkumar Patel & Ors. Vs Stci Finance Ltd., & Anr.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 940
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Amit Mahajan has held that independent, non-executive directors of an accused company cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, if the complaints do not include specific allegations detailing their active role in the offence.
Witnesses In Arya Samaj Mandir Marriages Must Be Genuine And Bonafide: Delhi High Court
Title: MUKESH KUMAR SEN v. STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 941
The Delhi High Court has declared as void a marriage solemnized between a woman and her real uncle in an Arya Samaj Mandir after a false affidavit was given by the man stating himself to be unmarried when he had a wife and son.
Reciprocal Promises In Settlement Agreements Must Be Executed Simultaneously: Delhi High Court
Case Title: M/S Hotel Marina & Anr Vs Vibha Mehta
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 942
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Navin Chawla has held in a settlement agreement where both parties have made reciprocal promises, these promises must be executed simultaneously.
Delhi High Court Declares 'Boroline' As Well Known Trademark, Restrains Use Of 'Borobeauty'
Title: G.D. PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S CENTO PRODUCTS (INDIA)
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 943
The Delhi High Court has declared the word “Boroline”, used for selling an antiseptic ayurvedic cream, as a well-known trademark under the Trade Marks Act.
Case Title: Aptec Advanced Protective Technologies Ag Vs Union Of India & Anr
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 944
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani has held that an order by arbitral tribunal addressing applications related to the discovery and inspection of documents does not constitute an interim award if it does not resolve a matter at issue between the parties.
Title: CA RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA v. DELHI HIGH COURT THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 945
The Delhi High Court has recently dismissed a plea seeking enhanced implementation of live streaming of court proceedings and for completing pending work in the live streaming process in a time-bound manner.
Case Title: Kunal Food Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs Delhi Development Authority
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 946
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Prateek Jalan has held that it is reasonable for an arbitrator to deny pre-reference and pendente lite interest when the applicant is partially responsible for delays in completing the project.
Title: GANTAVYA GULATI v. UNION OF INDIA
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 947
The Delhi High Court has directed the Union Government to treat as representation a petition filed against the exclusion of a provision similar to Section 377 of now repealed Indian Penal Code, 1860, from the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
Case Title: M/S Kamladityya Construction Pvt Ltd VS Rail Land Development Authority
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 948
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice C. Hari Shankar has held that an arbitration clause is invalid if it does not allow the contractor to select an arbitrator from a panel provided by the Railway.
Title: RAJNEESH v. UNION OF INDIA
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 949
The Delhi High Court has ordered that mandatory regular trainings be provided to Officers holding the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC) proceedings under the Border Security Force (BSF) Act and Rules.
Title: Shashi Tharoor v. State
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 950
The Delhi High Court has refused to quash the defamation case filed against Congress MP Shashi Tharoor over his alleged "scorpion on Shivling" remark against Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Title: SMT. SANTOSH TYAGI v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 951
The Delhi High Court has recently observed that the right to residence in matrimonial or shared household of women under the Domestic Violence Act must be balanced with the protections afforded to senior citizens under the Senior Citizens Act.
Case Title: TIGER GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL III HOLDINGS Vs THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOMETAX) & ORS
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 952
While overturning the AAR ruling in the case of Tiger Global - Flipkart transaction, the Delhi High Court allowed India Mauritius DTAA (Double taxation avoidance agreement) benefit to petitioner/ assessee on ground that the transaction stands grandfathered by Article 13(3A) of India-Mauritius Treaty.
Delhi High Court Rejects Plea Against JDU's Internal Elections Electing Nitish Kumar As President
Title: GOVIND YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 953
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea challenging the internal party elections held by Janata Dal United (JDU) in 2016 electing Nitish Kumar as President of the political party.
Title: MOHIT JITENDRA KUKADIA v. UNION OF INDIA
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 954
The Delhi High Court has directed the Central Government to grant National Overseas Scholarship for studying Masters of Public Policy at the University of Oxford to a student hailing from traditional artisans family in Gujarat.
Title: THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ANR. v. SYNDICATE INNOVATIONS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED & ORS.
Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 955
The Delhi High Court has recently observed that there is a complete state of confusion and lack of clarity in the Government regulations in relation to the arms and ammunition industry.