Rs. 200 Crore Extortion Case: Jacqueline Fernandez Moves Delhi High Court Seeking Quashing Of Money Laundering Case

Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandez has moved the Delhi High Court seeking quashing of a money laundering case registered against her by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) involving alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar.

In her plea moved through Advocates Prashant Patil and Aman Nandrajog, Fernandez has sought quashing of ED's ECIR as well as the second supplementary complaint arraigning her as the tenth accused in the Rs. 200 crore extortion case.

The actress has said that the evidence filed by ED would prove that she is an “innocent victim” of Sukesh Chandrashekhar's “maliciously targeted attack.”

“There is absolutely no indication the she had any involvement whatsoever in aiding him to launder his purportedly ill-gotten wealth. Hence, she cannot be prosecuted for the offenses under Section 3, and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002,” the plea said.

It adds that is an admitted case of ED that the Tihar jail officials provided Sukesh Chandrashekhar unrestricted access to mobile phones and other technology which was used by him to con the original complainant and many film artists including her with an identical modus operandi.

It has also been submitted that once ED, in its discretion, has presented Fernandez as a Prosecution Witness in the predicate offence, it logically follows that any proceedings arising as a consequence of the same should be quashed.

“The fact that the Petitioner's statement has been recorded as a prosecution witness in the predicate offense naturally leads to a favorable conclusion in her favor. This supports the contention that she had no knowledge whatsoever of the predicate offense committed by the main accused, Sukesh Chandrashekhar, and his associates,” the plea adds.

Furthermore, the actress has averred that subjecting her to trial for money laundering based solely on ED's “unsubstantiated assumptions”, devoid of any concrete documentary evidence, is unwarranted and unjust.

“…it is crucial to note that the Directorate of Enforcement itself uses the phrase "could have," indicating a lack of concrete evidence to establish that the Petitioner was indeed aware of Sukesh's incarceration. While the Petitioner acknowledges that she could have been more vigilant, this alone does not render her a criminal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002,” the plea adds.

Title: JACQUELINE FERNANDEZ v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT