Delhi High Court
Arbitration Clause Valid Despite Even Number Of Arbitrators: Delhi High Court Allows Section 11(6) Petition
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh has held that the arbitration clause is not invalidated merely on the ground that the number of arbitrators, as per the arbitration clause, was an even number and therefore, was in contravention of Section 10 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Section 10 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 states that the...
Swati Maliwal Assault Case: Accused Bibhav Kumar Moves Delhi High Court Seeking Bail
Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's close aide Bhibhav Kumar has approached the Delhi High Court seeking bail in the alleged Swati Maliwal assault case.Kumar was denied bail by the trial court on May 27. His second regular bail plea was rejected by the sessions court on June 07. The bail plea has been filed through Advocates Karan Sharma and Rajat Bharadwaj. It is Kumar's case that it is a...
[Arbitration Act] Mere Sending of Notice Under Section 21 Not Enough, Receipt of Notice Essential: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma has held that merely sending notice of arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not sufficient. It held that receipt of the notice is the prerequisite for the commencement of arbitration proceedings. Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: "21. Commencement...
NEET-UG 2024: Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Pleas Challenging Award Of Grace Marks, Alleged Paper Leak
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday issued notice on four fresh pleas filed challenging the award of grace marks as well as the alleged paper leak concerning the NEET (UG) Examination held on May 05. A vacation bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna sought response of the National Testing Agency (NTA) in the pleas moved by four candidates, Adarsh Raj Gupta, Keya Azad, Mohammed Florez and Anavadya...
Mere Initiation Of Arbitration Proceedings Doesn't Bar Corporate Debtor From Pursing Remedies Under IBC: Delhi High Court Allows Section 11(6) Petition
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna held that mere initiation of the arbitration proceedings does not bar the corporate debtor from pursuing his other remedies including those under the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code. Brief Facts: The Respondents, who were the founders/promoters of Petitioner No.1, approached OFB Tech Private Limited and Petitioner No.2 with...
Predictable Application Of Existing Technology To New Context Not "Inventive Step": Delhi HC Rejects Patent To Portable Vehicle Tracker
The Delhi High Court has confirmed an order of the Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs refusing patent registration to "Portable Vehicle Management System" which claimed novel features like Real-time Monitoring of vehicle & Assistance, Anomaly Detection, Alert Generation, Detection and Masking of Faces, Portability, etc.Single Bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula observed that all...
[Arbitration Act] Non-Disclosure Of Section 9 Petition In Another Matter Can't Be Termed As 'Egregious Fraud': Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju held that non-disclosure of the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in another matter cannot be termed as a case of egregious fraud, which would disentitle a party from pursuing its petition under Section 9. Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...
Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 03 To June 09, 2024
Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 673 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 706NOMINAL INDEXCase Title: Network 18 Media and Investments Limited & Ors v WWW.BrawlersFightClub.Com & Ors 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 673Case Title: Sanjeev Goyal v. Union of India 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 674Case Title: M/S Divyam Real Estate Pvt Ltd Vs M/S M2k Entertainment Pvt Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 675Case Title: M/S Space 4 Business...
'We Are Living In Era Of Deepfakes': Delhi High Court Says Photos Produced By Husband Alleging Adultery By Wife Must Be Proved In Trial
The Delhi High Court has refused to rely on the photographs produced by a man to show that his wife has been living in adultery and to claim that she is not entitled to receive maintenance from him under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.The Division Bench comprising Justice Rajeev Shakdher and Justice Amit Bansal observed that in this era of "deepfakes", it is necessary that the...
Land For Jobs Scam: Delhi High Court Orders Medical Evaluation Of Lalu Yadav's Aide Amit Katyal Hauled Up In PMLA Case
The Delhi High Court has constituted a medical board of AIIMS to evaluate the condition of RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav's close aide Amit Katyal, who is in custody in a money laundering case related to the alleged land-for-jobs scam case.Justice Vikas Mahajan was dealing with Katyal's plea seeking his release on humanitarian and medical grounds. The court directed the Director of All...
Accused Can't Be Blamed For Delaying Trial If He Chooses To Avail Legal Remedy: Delhi High Court In Sharjeel Imam's Case
While granting statutory bail to Sharjeel Imam in a UAPA case, the Delhi High Court observed that an accused cannot be blamed for causing delay in the trial if he chooses to avail legal remedy. “If any accused chooses to avail legal remedy and that too in terms of specific judicial pronouncement, he cannot be blamed for causing delay in the matter,” a division bench comprising Justice...
Delhi High Court Rules In Favour Of Journalist Rajat Sharma, Restrains Use Of 'Baap Ki Adalat'
Ruling in favour of senior journalist Rajat Sharma, the Delhi High Court recently restrained an individual from using India TV logo and “Baap Ki Adalat” trademark in the content posted by him on social media.Justice Anish Dayal also restrained the man, Ravindra Kumar Choudhary, from using the photograph, video and name of Sharma, either as a trademark or logo in the social media posts,...