Allahabad HC Bench Recuses From Hearing Mohammed Zubair's Plea Against UP Police FIR Over 'X Post' On Yati Narsinhanand

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

3 Dec 2024 1:11 PM IST

  • Allahabad HC Bench Recuses From Hearing Mohammed Zubairs Plea Against UP Police FIR Over X Post On Yati Narsinhanand
    Listen to this Article

    A bench of Allahabad High Court comprising Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Prashant Kumar today RECUSED from hearing a plea moved by challenging an FIR lodged by the Ghaziabad Police last month accusing him of promoting enmity among religious groups following a complaint by an associate of controversial priest Yati Narsinghanand.

    The bench recused itself within 20 minutes of the hearing and directed that the case be listed before another bench.

    The FIR against Zubair has been lodged by Udita Tyagi, general secretary of the Yati Narsinghanand Saraswati Trust, claims that Zubair posted a video clip of an old programme of Narsinghanand's on October 3 with the intent to provoke violence by Muslims against him.

    It has also been alleged in the complaint that Zubair posted edited clips of the priest on X (formerly Twitter), containing Narsinghanand's alleged incendiary remarks on Prophet Muhammad, to incite radical sentiments against the controversial priest. In his X Post, he called the alleged speech of Narsinghanand 'derogatory'.

    Zubai was booked under sections 196 (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion), 228 (fabricating false evidence), 299 (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings), 356(3) (defamation) and 351(2) (punishment for criminal intimidation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

    Last week, the HC was informed that it has invoked Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which criminalises acts endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India, against Zubair and that it is probing the case with utmost sincerity and due diligence.

    In his plea before the HC, Zubair has stated that his X post does not call for violence against Yati. He had merely alerted the police authorities about Narsinghanand's actions and sought action as per law, and this could not amount to promoting disharmony or ill-will between two classes of people.

    He has also challenged the invocation of the Defamation provision under the BNS on the grounds that seeking action against Narsinghanand by sharing his own videos, which are already in the public domain, cannot amount to defamation,

    The plea also states that at the time of making the derogatory remarks against the Prophet, Narsinghanand was on bail in another hate speech case, where his bail condition stipulated that he would not make any statements which promote communal disharmony.

    The matter is likely to come up for a hearing before a bench of Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Prashant Kumar.

    It may be noted that a PIL (Public Interest Litigation) is pending before the Allahabad High Court to restrain Yati Narsinghanand from raising questions against Prophet Mohammad and the holy book Qur'an.


    Next Story