All High Courts
UAPA | Only Special Or Sessions Court Can Extend Accused's Custody Beyond 90-Days, Magistrate Court Can't: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has set aside the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate that extended judicial custody of a Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) accused by another 90 days, and denied his right to default bail, opining it to be without jurisdiction, illegal and perverse.The bench of Justice Sudesh Bansal stated that the offences under UAPA were scheduled offences under...
Kerala High Court Stays Electricity Regulatory Commission's 2025 Renewable Energy Regulations
The Kerala High Court on Monday (November 10) stayed the operation, implementation/ enforcement and all further proceedings under the Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Renewable Energy and Related Matters) Regulations, 2025 issued by the Regulatory Commission vide a notification on November 5.Justice Mohammed Nias C.P. passed the interim order on a plea by Domestic On-Grid...
Railways Liable Even For Deaths Caused While Unauthorizedly Crossing Tracks If It Failed To Implement Preventive Measures: MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday (November 10) held that the Railways is liable to pay compensation even in deaths caused while unauthorized track crossing, if the Railways had failed to implement sufficient measures to prevent such unauthorized access to tracks.In the present case, the bench noted that the deceased Rajesh, who was 3 years old, came onto the Railway tracks and to save...
Court's Interference In Infrastructure Tenders On Technical Grounds Will Cause Huge Loss To State Exchequer: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has recently held that interference by High Court in tenders relating to infrastructure development, on technical grounds, will cause huge loss to State Exchequer and judicial interference in such matters must not be done unless specific and cogent grounds are made out that indicate arbitrariness.The bench of Justice Shekhar B. Saraf and Justice Prashant Kumar...
MV Act | Driver Not Jointly Liable For Accident; Owner Of Vehicle Solely Responsible To Pay Interim Compensation: HP High Court
The Himachal Pradesh High Court has held that under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, only the owner of a vehicle can be held liable to pay interim compensation on the principle of “no fault” and the driver of the vehicle cannot be made jointly liable with the owner.Justice Sushil Kukreja remarked that: “The driver could not have been made liable to pay the compensation...
Candidate Can't Rely On Undisclosed Qualification Long Time After Recruitment Is Closed Even If Vacancies Remain: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has set aside a single bench order directing the State to consider the candidature of the respondent based on his graduation mark-sheet which was never disclosed in his original application form, but only in a writ petition filed belatedly.The division bench of Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Justice Bipin Gupta opined that no candidate could be allowed to...
Indore Truck Rampage | MP High Court Summons Police Commissioner; Notes Sufficient Measures Were Not Implemented Despite Orders
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday (October 10) directed the Indore Police Commissioner to appear via video conferencing on November 19, after noting that despite orders, there have been repeated incidents of drunk driving and police inaction in Indore. These observations were made in a suo-motu plea initiated after a truck entered a residential area of Indore during peak traffic hours...
Madras High Court Asks State To Respond To Plea By Retired IAS Officer For Restoring Police Protection
The Madras High Court has directed the State government to respond to a plea by retired IAS officer U Sagayam for the restoration of police protection. It may be noted that in 2014, the Madras High Court had appointed Sagayam as a commission to probe into the alleged mining irregularities across the State. Since Sagayam started getting threats following this, the court had...
Why Are CARA Guidelines Not Being Amended To Include Adoption By Transgender Persons? Madras High Court Asks Central Govt
The Madras High Court has asked the central Government why the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) guidelines have not been amended till now to include adoption by transgender persons. The bench of Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G Arul Murugan directed the Union Government to explain why amendments had not been brought into the CARA Guidelines and...
'Victim's Mental State Remaining Normal Casts Doubt On Veracity Of Allegations': P&H High Court Suspends Teacher's Sentence In POCSO Case
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has suspended the sentence of a school teacher convicted for sexual harassment under Section 354-A IPC and Sections 10 & 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, during the pendency of his appeal.Justice Namit Kumar noted, "any child who would have experienced such an incident must have been mentally traumatised for a...
Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia Move Delhi High Court Against Privilege Committee Summons Over 'Phansi Ghar' Controversy
Aam Aadmi Party leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia have moved the Delhi High Court challenging the summons issued to them by Delhi Legislative Assembly's Privilege Committee over the “phansi ghar” controversy. Their petition will be heard tomorrow by Justice Sachin Datta. Phansi Ghar was inaugurated by Kejriwal and Sisodia inside the Assembly complex on August 22, 2022, when they...