Spare The Rod And Spoil The Child : Why India Is Not Yet Ready To Decriminalize Cannabis?

The drug affects a person's ability to understand and also their reaction time. So users get in car crashes more often than people who don't use cannabis. In India lately a lobby has emerged to legalise cannabis, for medical use, industrial use, and recreational.

Cannabis and its derivatives describe all products derived from the cannabis plant. Cannabis plant products include the flowering tops (marijuana), compressed cannabis resin (hashish), Cannabis oils and concentrated cannabis extracts (waxes). Cannabis has two components – THC (TETRA HYDROCANNABINOID) and CBD (CANNABINOID). CBD has few psychoactive effects and has anti inflammatory and Neuro Protective effects, THC produces the psychoactive effects such as euphoria, relaxation and heightened sensory experiences sought by recreational users.

Legal Stance in India.

• Section 2 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, act clearly demarcates in its definition of what is included and what is exempted-The flowering tops, seeds are not allowed to be cultivated whereas the leaves are exempted from this act.
• Cannabis is mistaken as a plant of only one variety- ironically Cannabis has several varieties with varied Components of THC and CBD. The most commonly used Cannabis plants are – Cannabis Sativa and Cannabis Indica. Bhang is a type of cannabis sativa, called Hemp, which has a low THC content and is not illegal to consume in India.

The government is working on ascertaining the greater usage of CBD which may be used as an analgesic, even though it's not as potent as morphine. Cannabis license is allowed and the state government has been given full autonomy to provide the license, subject to the conditions and the situation of that state.

As of date the state of Uttrakhand and Jammu and Kashmir have issued licenses to those players who have a registered research centre.CSIIR-IIM and a start up from Bombay, called Bombay Hemp company has come in collaboration with the state government with regard to conducting an extensive research in Cannabis and its medicinal uses along with industrial uses.

• Section 9, gives Central Government to permit control and regulate has control over opium whereas.
• In Section 10 gives power of state government to permit control and regulate, cultivation, to transport Cannabis. So it cannot be said that opium is at par with Cannabis.
• Section 14 special provision relating to cannabis for horticulture use. Section 64 power to tender Immunity from prosecution.
• Section 64 says Immunity from prosecution to addicts volunteering for treatment. This is in a way partial decriminalization of the Cannabis, as per the stand by the department of revenue. Because there is no jail time or penalty for the same so the approach of the government with regard to Cannabis is apt. Bhang is allowed and is exempted from the NDPS act , because of only this reason, that its THC content is low, and it is the leaf of the Cannabis plant, and this variety is called hemp, production and cultivation of hemp is allowed by the state government provided they fulfill the requirement of declaring the plant in question or the seed in question, having a low THC content, as per the government of Uttrakhand in their rules of sanctioning the license, they require the licensee to declare that for industrial purposes the cannabis in question should have THC as low as 0.3%.
• Also CSIIR-IIM (Council Research Institute) has come together in collaboration for research and have obtained license in the state of Jammu and Kashmir.
• Section 2 of NDPS has given clear definition of what is included in Cannabis plant which is allowed and what isn't. The flower and the seeds are declared unlawful while the leaves have been exempted. Besides this the immunity aspect has been given to the addicts of cannabis which in a way means that cannabis is partially decriminalized.
• About the contention on cannabis being at par with opium is totally wrong as the deciding authority on opium is the Centre and for cannabis the state enjoys all autonomy for the same. So it's not at par with opium.

• As per the survey conducted by The Ministry of Social Justice in the year – the three substances that are abused in India are - Alcohol, Cannabis, and Opium. Which means, alcohol as liquor out of the way, the number one narcotic substance is cannabis?

Repercussions If Cannabis gets a green signal.

What is Law eventually, it's simply to regulate people. By decriminalizing cannabis, the government will allow the consumption of THC content and have it spread rampant in the society such that of India, the regulation will go in dustbin and slowly the Pandora's Box will open and eat up the whole society into a full blown anarchy. If you want that, then go ahead and issue notice and take it even further but if you understand the seriousness of the issue at hand this matter shouldn't see another light in the court. The WHO report on drug dependency states that usually cannabis precedes other drugs, overtime the person develops tolerance of the drug, the high and euphoria is not as dense and is usually short lived, eventually making the person move on to bigger pastures - Opium, Cocaine etc. An excerpt of Medical Marijuana paper states that upon experimentation a person got catalepsy after consuming Bhang, it's a state where in one loses consciousness and rigidity of body takes place.

People are also contending on trying to draw parallels on how USA has legalized Cannabis, and is heading towards a progressive society. The circumstances under which Cannabis has been legalized are very grave; a serious percentage of the US population has been addicted to cocaine, heroin leading to high number of deaths and abuse. The drug problem took over USA, hence as a step to reduce the occurrence of deaths and serious addictions to synthetic drug, a lesser evil, a lesser intoxicant was thought as the best solution to minimize the Cocaine and Opium usage. However in India we have got no such issue and we certainly cannot draw parallels without considering the context. However the state governments are giving licenses if they can declare that the hemp/Cannabis they are going to be using should have a low THC content – between 0.3% to 1.5%.

Judgments.

Aditya Barthakur vs. Department of Family health and welfare.

Cannabis remains contraband in India, after the Bombay high court dismissed a petition filed in April to decriminalise its use, on the ground that the legislature, and not the court, was the appropriate forum for the challenge.

A bench of justices VM Kanade and Shalini Phansalkar Joshi dismissed advocate Aditya Barthakur's petition that had produced evidence of the medicinal benefits of Cannabis, and ordered:

"We are afraid that this Court while exercising its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot grant the reliefs…Apart from that, the Petitioner has produced certain technical data regarding useful effects of Ganja etc. We are afraid that we are not experts in the field and the Petitioner can raise this issue in the Parliament"

Prashant Sharma vs. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and ors.

The Delhi High Court dismissed on 26^th July with a cost of Rs 10,000 a petition seeking to legalise cannabis, a banned drug which attracts criminal prosecution, for medical purpose

A bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar said there was no substance in the petition and it was not inclined to grant the prayer.

"It appears this petition is seeking direction to legalise cannabis for medical use. It can only be done by bringing proper enactment or amendment under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. We are not inclined to grant the prayer," the bench said.

The court said the cost of Rs 10,000 be deposited by the petitioner with the Delhi High Court Bar Association Library fund.

The court was hearing a petition by law student Prashant Sharma seeking direction to the authorities to allow medical use of cannabis and its allied products, frame a proper policy for it and make necessary amendments in the NDPS Act in this regard.

The plea, filed through advocates Pankaj Mehta and R K Mehta, said cannabis has been erroneously treated as a criminal justice issue instead of a public health issue and it is high time that these errors are corrected.

Great Legalisation Movement Trust vs. Union of India.

This matter is pending in the Delhi high court.

Doctors may have conflicting opinions, professional opinions, but the fact remains that this territory, once treaded upon will open a can of worms and once decriminalization takes place, it will only degrade the Indian society in its rut and act as a black hole sucking up everything that comes in its trajectory. Is India ready just yet? – Clearly not, because of our Socio economic issues and population and our callous attitude as people. We are still evolving. The population is diverse and not yet mature to handle this. Till the time the government doesn't totally ascertain as to what the uses of cannabis are, the government cannot really give it a green signal as its misuses far outweigh its uses. The Indian setup is not favorable for Cannabis, the repercussions are high, the cognitive growth will be redundant in young adults as has been verified in the INCB report (International Narcotics Control Board, 2019) It states that there are about 3.2 Crore users of Cannabis in India and the recent WHO report has given a complete clarity on how bad the situation will be if we open this can of worms.

The critical review report explains clearly the drug dependency that arises out of cannabis. In the end, it makes no sense for the government to make special laws on cannabis when it's partially decriminalized already and is in a perfect setup. No business can be conducted at the cost of millions of addicts. It is imperative to understand the gravity of the situation; India needs to walk before it can run.

(Author is a Central Govt. Standing Counsel at Delhi High Court. Views Are Personal Only)