Nafde concludes. Sr Advocate Nidhesh Gupta makes his brief submissions

Gupta : 4 reasons why Chinnaiah is contrary to the constitutional scheme. 1. constitution uses the expression SC/ST/SEBC in articles 15, partly 16(4), 46, 164, 243, 342,344,345,338E and 338B. etc it is only in 16(4) that uses backward classes...therefore the intent of the constitutional framers was that backward classes under 16(4) is a category where there are all at par (Indira Sahwney says backward classes included SC/ST/OBCs together)