Live Law
2022-09-14 05:38:49.0
J Bhat: In fact this was the context of Champakam. This is what petitioners argued, the argument made was 16, 14 etc- which was rejected by court.
Kumar: I agree. [Refers to Article 29]
Next Story
X
2022-09-14 05:38:49.0
J Bhat: In fact this was the context of Champakam. This is what petitioners argued, the argument made was 16, 14 etc- which was rejected by court.
Kumar: I agree. [Refers to Article 29]