Raval : I'll indicate the broad grounds of my reply.

First, the conduct of the petitioner. Conduct of petitioner is relevant for equitable jurisdiction. Second is about the maintainability of the petition. The FIR is against unnamed officers. On P Radhakrishnan, stating to be an ED official has filed the petition.

Third is about the entertainability of the petition and about the alternative remedies under Section 439.

Fourth is about the whole facade created about one agency investigating another agency.