Live Law

2021-03-15 07:14:43.0

  • Datar: In 1991, when the Central Government made the controversial office memorandum, even that was 27% because the 50% limit had to be taken into consideration. This submission is sufficient to strike down Sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Act.

    Datar: It has to be taken into account that Dr. Ambedkar himself contemplated that reservation had to be confined to minorities. Reservation for majority was never envisaged by the founding fathers. 

    Next Story