John again reads out the Vogue article to point out that the body of the article refers to multiple male bosses

'She doesn't have to source the statements made in the article to anyone, she had already put it in inverted commas, this is not a PhD paper', John argues

John points out that Ramani is not only referring to multiple male bosses, but also to multiple women

'Can there be any basis for the allegation that the complainant is making', John argues