Court room 2

Claimant speaker 2 argued that third party funding agreement is not necessarily required to be disclosed. The case cited in support of this assertion was not found to be applicable by the judges. Ms. Prasad asked a factual question to which the speaker gave a contradictory answer, and was asked to carry on. Mr. Mishra asked about the binding value of ICSID rulings. The speaker cited a case to answer the same, the judges seemed satisfied with the answer and the speaker proceeded with the next issue. Ms. Prasad interrupted the speaker by asking a question related to tariffs. The speaker said that he's not aware, and was asked to carry on with the submissions. Due to the paucity of time, the speaker summarized the last issue without any questions being posed to him