Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 9)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

23 Feb 2022 2:27 PM IST

  • Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 9)- LIVE UPDATES

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab....

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.

    The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.

    On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab. This arose in view of the AG's submission that the Government Order dated February 5, which has been challenged in the writ petitions, does not prescribe any ban on hijab and that it is only an "innocuous" order which asks students to follow the uniforms prescribed by their institutions.

    "What is your stand?Whether hijab can be permitted in institutions or not?", the Chief Justice raised a pointed query.

    "The operative portion of the GO leaves it to the institutions", the AG submitted.

    "If institutions permit hijab, you have objections?", the CJ asked further

    "If the institutions are to permit, we would possibly take a decision as and when the issue arises...", the AG responded.

    "You have to take a stand", the CJI reiterated.

    "My answer is that we have not prescribed anything. The Order , it gives complete autonomy to institution to decide uniform. Whether students be allowed to wear dress or apprarel which could be symbol of religion, the stand of the state is.. element of introducing religious dress should not be there in uniform. As a matter of principle, the answer is in preamble of Karnataka Education Act which is to foster secular environment", the AG replied.

    During yesterday's hearing AG argued that petitioners have not shown that wearing hijab is an essential religious practice in Islam and thus, the protection under Article 25 of the Constitution is not available to them.

    FOLLOW THE LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:02 PM IST

      Naganand : Violation of Article 25 is debated. Govt has not prescribed, it has said institution take decision. In our case institution has taken decision (for uniforms) since 2004.

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:01 PM IST

      Nagananand : Mother's affidavit does not specify on what knowledge the facts are being verified. Mother could not have verified the affidavit as the daughter is a major.

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:00 PM IST

      Naganand submits that the petition is not supported by a proper affidavit. Mother has verified the affidavit though petitioner is a major.

      "I am not raising this as a technical ground. How does mother know what happened in class and to other students in the class"

    • 23 Feb 2022 2:59 PM IST

      Chief Justice: You mean to say that uniform is compulsory since 2004-05?

      Naganand: Yes. It has been consistently the same since 2004. There was no problem and students were

      It is not some stray resolution.

    • 23 Feb 2022 2:57 PM IST

      Naganand : The two representations given by students, which I have annexed, do not contain these allegations. In September if something is done, will a student go home silently, and make a complaint after three months and file a petition six months later?

    • 23 Feb 2022 2:56 PM IST

      Naganand: Not rewarding them internal marks? To which student it was done? Only bald allegations. They have also introduced a false allegation that since September 2021, petitioners faced discrimination, in their classes. I have denied it.

    • 23 Feb 2022 2:55 PM IST

      Naganad: They say teachers were scolding etc. These are serious allegation, the petitioners have not substantiated it. They say the threat was to mark them absent. Yes if they dont attend class they will be marked absent. What threat?

    • 23 Feb 2022 2:55 PM IST

      Justice Dixit: When was the complaint lodged? State should have disclosed it to us.

      AG : I was not aware. I will find out.

      Justice Dixit : Are you afraid or what?

      AG : Certainly not.

    • 23 Feb 2022 2:54 PM IST

      Naganand: One more allegation is that we were scolding the students. We are teachers for many years and they treat students like their kith and kin. I deny the allegations.

    • 23 Feb 2022 2:52 PM IST

      Naganand : Some teachers were also threatened by their organisation. They were scared to lodge a complaint. A complaint was lodged yesterday by one of the teachers.

    Next Story