Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 9)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

23 Feb 2022 2:27 PM IST

  • Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 9)- LIVE UPDATES

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab....

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.

    The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.

    On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab. This arose in view of the AG's submission that the Government Order dated February 5, which has been challenged in the writ petitions, does not prescribe any ban on hijab and that it is only an "innocuous" order which asks students to follow the uniforms prescribed by their institutions.

    "What is your stand?Whether hijab can be permitted in institutions or not?", the Chief Justice raised a pointed query.

    "The operative portion of the GO leaves it to the institutions", the AG submitted.

    "If institutions permit hijab, you have objections?", the CJ asked further

    "If the institutions are to permit, we would possibly take a decision as and when the issue arises...", the AG responded.

    "You have to take a stand", the CJI reiterated.

    "My answer is that we have not prescribed anything. The Order , it gives complete autonomy to institution to decide uniform. Whether students be allowed to wear dress or apprarel which could be symbol of religion, the stand of the state is.. element of introducing religious dress should not be there in uniform. As a matter of principle, the answer is in preamble of Karnataka Education Act which is to foster secular environment", the AG replied.

    During yesterday's hearing AG argued that petitioners have not shown that wearing hijab is an essential religious practice in Islam and thus, the protection under Article 25 of the Constitution is not available to them.

    FOLLOW THE LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:40 PM IST

      Nagabnad: There are two categories of muslims, Khoja and Kutchi Memons. In a case, they said though we are Mohammedan, Hindu law will apply to us.

      Refers to a division bench judgment of Bombay High Court of 1992.

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:37 PM IST

      Naganand : I remember in colleges students, students from Tehran would come in Bangalore. We used to see hordes living here. At that time purdah etc was not needed.

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:37 PM IST

      Naganand : In Iran, during Shah's rule, Tehran was called the Paris of the East. Life there was as flamboyant and luxurious as in Paris. There was no purdah, even though it was a muslim state.

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:36 PM IST

      Naganand now refers to Bijeo Emannuel case : In that case, it was not disputed that it was essential for Jehova's Witness to not sing in praise of anyone except Jehova. It was in that context the judgment came,

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:28 PM IST

      Naganand refers to a judgment on allowing Sikh person to wear kirpan.

      In Article 25(2), explanation is given allowing kirpan, he adds

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:26 PM IST

      Naganand refers to Allahabad HC judgment which held that use of loudspeaker was not an integral part of azaan in Mosques.

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:23 PM IST

      Naganand refers to a decision where the Court said No to an argument by Hindus that bursting of crackers was necessary for a festival.

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:22 PM IST

      Naganand: If in the wisdom of this committee, they take a decision that there should be uniformity . It is good for students because it will rid the students of the overarching influence of religion. Because they have come for education, and what is the need for external symbols.

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:20 PM IST

      Naganand cites a Supreme Court decision on use of loudspeaker in a church 2000 7 SCC 282.

    • 23 Feb 2022 3:19 PM IST

      Naganand: No fundamental right is absolute. Article 25 starts with "subject to". My right for peaceful existence cannot be threatened by somebody saying I want to exercise my religious rights. SC has said in many decisions.

    Next Story