Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 8)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

22 Feb 2022 2:07 PM IST

  • Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 8)- LIVE UPDATES

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab....

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.

    The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.

    On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab. This arose in view of the AG's submission that the Government Order dated February 5, which has been challenged in the writ petitions, does not prescribe any ban on hijab and that it is only an "innocuous" order which asks students to follow the uniforms prescribed by their institutions.

    "What is your stand?Whether hijab can be permitted in institutions or not?", the Chief Justice raised a pointed query.

    "The operative portion of the GO leaves it to the institutions", the AG submitted.

    "If institutions permit hijab, you have objections?", the CJ asked further

    "If the institutions are to permit, we would possibly take a decision as and when the issue arises...", the AG responded.

    "You have to take a stand", the CJI reiterated.

    "My answer is that we have not prescribed anything. The Order , it gives complete autonomy to institution to decide uniform. Whether students be allowed to wear dress or apprarel which could be symbol of religion, the stand of the state is.. element of introducing religious dress should not be there in uniform. As a matter of principle, the answer is in preamble of Karnataka Education Act which is to foster secular environment", the AG replied.

    FOLLOW THE LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:06 PM IST

      AG : The restriction on wearing hijab is not within the school, it is only within the classroom, during the class hours. The discontinuation of particular practise, does it have any change in religion.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:05 PM IST

      AG : Reasonableness of uniform is not in question. This restriction of uniform is upto 17 years, in PU-II. The Education Act's preamble says formation of secular outlook as an objective.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:02 PM IST

      AG refers to State Of Madras vs V.G. Row on test of reasonableness of restrictions.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:01 PM IST

      AG : The independent claim of Article 19 (1) (a) cannot go with Article 25 claim.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:01 PM IST

      AG: We have a law in the form of Karnataka Eduational Institutions Classification. Rule 11 can be called into question but that has not been questioned. This rule imposes upon them a reasonable restriction on wearing a particular headgear.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:00 PM IST

      Justice Dixit : After the bank nationalisation case, fundamental rights are not seen as watertight compartments.

    • 22 Feb 2022 2:59 PM IST

      AG: The right to wear hijab as a Article 19 right can be restricted under Article 19 (2). In the present case, Rule 11 places a reasonable restriction inside the institutions. It is subject to institutional discipline.

    • 22 Feb 2022 2:58 PM IST

      Chief Justice : Suppose if someone want to wear it and exercise 19 (1) (a)?

      AG: Our stand is that in our country there is no prohibition in wearing hijab.

      Justice Dixit : What CJ is asking if they are only claiming 19(1)(a), what is your stand?

    • 22 Feb 2022 2:57 PM IST

      AG: Art 25 has an element of compulsion as far as dress is concerned. The consequences of a declaration of a court in ERP is that every member of the community is bound to abide. 

    • 22 Feb 2022 2:56 PM IST

      AG : Claiming Article 19(1)(a) right is destructive to Article 25. Article 25 right is for compulsory practice. When you assert Article 19(1)(a), it means choice.

    Next Story