EWS Reservation- Supreme Court Constitution Bench Hearing DAY 2- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

14 Sep 2022 5:03 AM GMT

  • EWS Reservation- Supreme Court Constitution Bench Hearing DAY 2- LIVE UPDATES

    The Supreme Court Constitution Bench will commence the hearing on the cases challenging the constitutional validity of reservation for economically weaker section of citizens. The petitions challenge the validity of Constitution (103rd) Amendment Act 2019. Economic reservation in jobs and education was proposed to be provided by inserting clause (6) in Articles 15 and 16 of the...

    The Supreme Court Constitution Bench will commence the hearing on the cases challenging the constitutional validity of reservation for economically weaker section of citizens. 

    The petitions challenge the validity of Constitution (103rd) Amendment Act 2019. Economic reservation in jobs and education was proposed to be provided by inserting clause (6) in Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution through the amendment passed by the Parliament in January 2019. The newly inserted Article 15(6) enabled the State to make special provisions for advancement of any economically weaker section of citizens, including reservations in educational institutions. It states that such reservation can be made in any educational institution, including private institutions, whether aided or unaided, except minority educational institutions covered under Article 30(1). It further states that the upper limit of the reservation will be ten percent, which will be in addition to the existing reservations. After the amendment was notified by the President, a batch of petitions were filed in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of economic reservation.

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 14 Sep 2022 9:09 AM GMT

      Kumar: Let us test it on first principle? What is the ration? Poverty. What is the nexus with the object of classification? Object is to provide jobs. How are these poor people different than other poor people?

    • 14 Sep 2022 9:03 AM GMT

      J Bhat: Where is that- when the govt set to defend it saying that when it's not 16(4), it's 16(1)- which the court has struck down. So under the old regime could not be done.

    • 14 Sep 2022 9:02 AM GMT

      Kumar [continues from Indira Sawhney judgement]: "Any reservation or affirmative action on economic criteria cannot be upheld under the doctrine of reasonable classification." So economic criteria is incapable of rational classification.

    • 14 Sep 2022 9:02 AM GMT

      Kumar [continues reading from Indira Sawhney judgement]: If there is a disparity between rich and poor, it has to be minimised. Public servants- maximum paid should be 10, and lowest should be 1- 1/10 is the ratio. This is remedy for poor man, that is, minimum inequality.

    • 14 Sep 2022 8:59 AM GMT

      Kumar: How will you determine if these people are inadequately represented? What is the group? You cannot take a family and say that they're inadequately represented. 16(4) also lays down who are economically weaker sections. 

    • 14 Sep 2022 8:59 AM GMT

      Kumar: [continues from Justice Sahai's opinion]: "Since Article 16(4) has a constitutional purpose and is to go on only till such goal is achieved, economic backwardness is not eligible..."

    • 14 Sep 2022 8:58 AM GMT

      Kumar: [continues from Justice Sahai's opinion] "Any reservation curtailing right of equal opportunity has to withstand the test of equal protection or benign discrimination...It should be a continuous suffering."

    • 14 Sep 2022 8:54 AM GMT

      Kumar: [Reading Justice Sahai's opinion in Indira Sawhney judgement] "De facto difficulties in determining such backwardness stand..."

    • 14 Sep 2022 8:54 AM GMT

      Kumar: (from Indira Sawhney) "Backward class cannot be only on basis of solely economic criteria." This is the view uniformly taken by this court. That is why this is a legislative Judgement to overrule Indira Sawhney.

      [Refers to Justice Sahai's opinion]

    • 14 Sep 2022 8:54 AM GMT

      Kumar: My predecessor has already read Justice Sawant's declaration. (in Indira Sawhney)

      [Reads majority opinion]

    Next Story