PIL Against 'Permissible Marriage Age' For Muslim Girls | Uttarakhand HC Grants Last Opportunity To Respondents To File Reply
The Uttarakhand High Court has granted a last opportunity to the state government as well as the Central Government to file their responses in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plea questioning the permissible age of marriage of girls under Muslim Law."In case, counter affidavits are not filed, on the next date, the Secretary, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India and...
The Uttarakhand High Court has granted a last opportunity to the state government as well as the Central Government to file their responses in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plea questioning the permissible age of marriage of girls under Muslim Law.
"In case, counter affidavits are not filed, on the next date, the Secretary, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India and the Chief Secretary, the State of Uttarakhand, shall personally remain present before the Court," the Court ordered.
It may be noted that the bench of Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Manoj K. Tiwari had, last month, issued a notice on the instant PIL plea moved by the Youth Bar Association of India and has posted the matter for further hearing on October 11, 2022.
However, on October 11, the Court noted that no counter affidavits were filed by any of the respondents.
In view of this, noting that the issue raised in the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plea is serious in nature, the High Court, as the last opportunity, granted the respondents time to file their respective counter-affidavits within four weeks and listed the matter for further hearing on November 16, 2022.
In related news, earlier this week, the Supreme Court issued notice on the petition filed by the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) challenging a recent judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which held that a 16-year-old Muslim girl can enter into a valid marriage.
A bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Abhay S Oka appointed Senior Advocate R Rajasekhar Rao as an amicus curiae for assistance on the issue.
About the plea before the Uttarakhand High Court
The PIL plea has sought directions to the Governments to formulate a Standard Operating Procedure for ensuring that girls below 18 years of age may not be permitted to marry, irrespective of her religion, customs, and local or personal laws in the larger public interest.
The PIL plea specifically refers to the practice permissible under Muslim Law, wherein Muslim girls are allowed to marry upon attaining the age of 15 years.
Further, the plea states that when a Muslim girl is permitted to enter into a valid marriage, while she is a child herself, the same violates her basic right to live with dignity, education, health, and protection which are guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Calling it detrimental in various aspects, the Plea avers thus:
"Child marriage violates their rights and places them at high risk of violence, exploitation, and abuse. Child marriage ends childhood. It negatively influences the rights to education, health and protection which is guaranteed by the constitution of India to every citizen. These consequences impact not just the girl directly, but also her family and community...When a girl between the age of 15 to 18 years solemnizes the marriage, it does not mean that she is no longer a child or that she is mentally or physically capable of engaging in sexual activity and conjugal relations."
The Plea further questions whether by way of permitting a Muslim girl to marry before attaining the age of 18 years, would result in violation of laws like "The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006" and "The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012" and same would also be against constitutional morality.
The plea also states that the legal age of marriage in the case of a girl is 18 years, however, the plea adds, in a catena of decisions our courts had presumed that the age of a Muslim girl to enter into a valid marriage is 15 years.
In this regard, the plea referred to the case of Gulam Deen and another versus State of Punjab and others, wherein the Punjab & Haryana High Court had granted protection to a couple who got married against the will of their families, where the Muslim girl was 16 years of age.
"Because the Muslim Personal Law allows a girl to get married at 15 years of age with her consent. The main question that arises here is "whether the consent is valid or not? As being a 15-year-old child, she is not mature enough to understand the after effects of marriage. Marriage comes with a lot of responsibilities which a child can never understand. Girls are treated as a baggage in our society and it is the harsh reality. The parents think that getting a girl married is the biggest responsibility on them. For the age of the girl is irrelevant they can easily influence their daughter to get married," the plea adds.
Lastly, stressing that it is the duty of the Government to take some effective step immediately to deal with the issue of Child marriage, the plea prays that the process of making "The Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021" into an act should be expedited and the act should come into force as soon as possible.
Case title - Youth Bar Association of India v. Union of India and Others