Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing(Day 3)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

15 Feb 2022 2:10 PM IST

  • Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing(Day 3)- LIVE UPDATES

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions. The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.On Friday the Court requested the State to re-open the educational institutions at the earliest and...

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.

    The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.

    On Friday the Court requested the State to re-open the educational institutions at the earliest and has restrained students from wearing any sort of religious clothes in classrooms, regardless of their faith, while the matter is pending hearing.

    Senior advocate Devadatt Kamat appearing on behalf of aggrieved students made extensive arguments on Monday. It is the petitioner's case that the right to wear hijab is an essential religious practice under Islam, and the State is not empowered to interfere with such rights under Articles 14,19 and 25 of the Constitution.

    Live Updates

    • 15 Feb 2022 3:23 PM IST

      Kamat says that the school argued that the Hindu girl had agreed to the school code, use of nose ring was not a popular practice, the ban on nose ring had no impact on her culture as she is free to wear it outside. Same arguments in Hijab case as well.

    • 15 Feb 2022 3:19 PM IST

      Kamat says that the Hindu girl pleaded in the Court that the practice of wearing nose ring was a part of long standing tradition in South India.  

    • 15 Feb 2022 3:17 PM IST

      Kamat says the South African judgment was related to the claim of a Hindu girl from South India to wear a nose ring. The school did not permit. The school said it will lead to a "parade of horrible". 

    • 15 Feb 2022 3:16 PM IST

      Kamat refers to another judgment of the constitutional court of South Africa.

      Justice Dixit : This judgment is rendered in the light of the text of the Constitutional provisions. How they read?

      Kamat says the judgment refers to the provisions.

    • 15 Feb 2022 3:15 PM IST

      Kamat :Here presuming that there is a uniform, somebody is asking for an exemption. It is the duty of state and school to accommodate and not punish.

    • 15 Feb 2022 3:14 PM IST

      Kamat says that the case pertained to Rastafarian followers who have to grow hair into dreadlocks.

    • 15 Feb 2022 3:12 PM IST

      Justice Dixit asks if those decisions are from theocratic states.

      Kamat says they are from secular constitution. He refers to a South African judgment.

    • 15 Feb 2022 3:11 PM IST

      Kamat now responds to bench's query regarding judgments of foreign courts on Hijab.

      Kamat : Your lordships Dixit cited the Upanishad (verse cited) the other day, that knowledge from all directions should be welcomed.

    • 15 Feb 2022 3:09 PM IST

      Kamat : It cannot be that by Education Act you can curb religious beliefs. Otherwise, it is a very dangerous proposition. State will say there is an Act and based on that we will curb somebody's freedom.

    • 15 Feb 2022 3:08 PM IST

      Kamat: To counter that, if somebody wears a shawl, you will have to show that is it a display of religious identity alone or is it something more. If it is sanctioned by Hinduism, by our Vedas or Upanishads then the court is duty bound to protect it.

    Next Story