Plea Against Professor Saibaba's Discharge- Supreme Court Special Saturday Hearing-Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

15 Oct 2022 10:48 AM IST

  • Plea Against Professor Saibabas Discharge- Supreme Court Special Saturday Hearing-Live Updates

    The Supreme Court, is hearing plea by the State of Maharashtra challenging Bombay High Court's order acquitting former Delhi University professor G N Saibaba and five others in alleged Maoist links case.A Bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and Bela M. Trivedi is hearing the matter in a special Saturday sittingOn Friday, the Bombay High Court had allowed their appeals against conviction and...

    The Supreme Court, is hearing plea by the State of Maharashtra challenging Bombay High Court's order acquitting former Delhi University professor G N Saibaba and five others in alleged Maoist links case.

    A Bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and Bela M. Trivedi is hearing the matter in a special Saturday sitting

    On Friday, the Bombay High Court had allowed their appeals against conviction and life sentence imposed under the anti-terror law UAPA. On the same day, in the evening, the SLP assailing the said order was mentioned before the Bench comprising Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Hima Kohli by Solicitor General, Mr. Tushar Mehta for early listing. He, orally, sought for a stay on the order of the Bombay High Court in the interim. Reluctant to grant stay of operation of an order of acquittal, the Bench, at the request of the SG granted him liberty to file an application for administrative decision of the CJI, Justice UU Lalit to list the matter on Saturday (today).

    While acquitting the respondents herein, the Bombay High Court held that the trial was null and void as valid sanction as required under Section 45 of the UAPA was not obtained. The Court observed that procedural safeguards cannot be sacrificed at the altar of a "perceived peril to national security".

    Follow Live Updates Here 

    Live Updates

    • 15 Oct 2022 11:51 AM IST

      Justice Shah to Basant: You may have argued everything, but can the benefit of the mistake committed by the HC be given to the accused.

    • 15 Oct 2022 11:50 AM IST

      Justice Shah : We are finding a fault with the High Court for not entering the merits of the case and for finding a short cut to decide.

      Basant : It was not a short-cut, it was a correct legal argument.

    • 15 Oct 2022 11:50 AM IST

      Basant : We have argued on full on merits. High Court only considers one aspect. Kindly see my plight, our incarceration will be prolonged.

      Justice Shah : We are not finding fault with you, we are finding fault with the HC for not entering the merits of the case.

    • 15 Oct 2022 11:48 AM IST

      Basant : Therefore there is no need to suspend the impugned judgment now. I will execute the bond and be available before your lordship.

    • 15 Oct 2022 11:48 AM IST

      Basant : I draw your attention to Section 437A CrPC- Bond to require accused to appear before next appellate Court. See the HC order, 437A bond is demanded. Appellants are directed to execute bond under 437A. This means, my presence before this court is already secured

    • 15 Oct 2022 11:46 AM IST

      Justice Trivedi: The HC has acquitted on issue of sanction and without reversing the findings of the Trial Court. Kindly understand this.

      Justice Shah to Basant : You can make that submission on the ground that the judgment need not be suspended.

    • 15 Oct 2022 11:45 AM IST

      Basant : I don't object to grant the leave, but please don't suspend the order, that is all I am going to argue.

    • 15 Oct 2022 11:43 AM IST

      Justice Shah : See, sanctioning authority is not conducting the trial. The thing is if there is application of mind. We will formulate the questions of law to be considered .

    • 15 Oct 2022 11:43 AM IST

      J Shah : Accused 1 to 5 were also acquitted on the sole ground one document was not considered by sanctioning authority. If sanctioning authority says prima facie satisfaction, whether further reasons are required. That is a question to be considered.

    • 15 Oct 2022 11:42 AM IST

      Justice Shah : We will issue notice, grant leave, we will keep it after vacation, we will formulate the questions. Need to hear accused 1 to 5 as well.

      Basant : I am not objecting to granting leave.

    Next Story