Pleas Challenging Marital Rape Exception : Live Updates From Supreme Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

17 Oct 2024 12:25 PM IST

  • Pleas Challenging Marital Rape Exception : Live Updates From Supreme Court
    Listen to this Article

    The Supreme Court is hearing today a batch of petitions seeking the criminalisation of marital rape.

    The petitioners challenge the constitutional validity of the exception of Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code which hold that sexual intercourse between a husband and wife will not come within the ambit of the offence of rape. The same provision is found in Section 63 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which is the replacement of S.375 IPC. Some petitions challenge the BNS provision too.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra is hearing the matter.

    The Union in its recent affidavit opposed the Court criminalising marital rape. The Union stated that alternative remedies in law already exist to protect married women against sexual violence and attracting the offence of "rape" to the institution of marriage may be "excessively harsh" and disproportionate.

    Follow this thread for live-updates.

    Live Updates

    • 17 Oct 2024 3:11 PM IST

      J Pardiwala : In case a husband demands, the wife declines, then he goes to the extent of confining her , that is wrongful confinement, then he threatens her then she succumbs and act is done - S. 323, 324, 325, 326 etc happens- all these are done so that the wife succumbs but it is exempted under the exception

    • 17 Oct 2024 3:09 PM IST

      Nandy: when there is rape outside of marriage you will also have S. 326

    • 17 Oct 2024 2:39 PM IST

      Nandy: Joseph Shine also deals with this aspect

    • 17 Oct 2024 2:39 PM IST

      CJI: what do you have to say by the argument that striking down the exception and criminalizing the acts of non-consensual intercourse would have the possibility of de-stabilizing the marriage

    • 17 Oct 2024 2:36 PM IST

      Nandy: the parliamentary sovereignty approach in England means the Courts have a hands off approach....this court was never held back in striking down such provisions

    • 17 Oct 2024 2:34 PM IST

      Nandy refers to the 'Hails Principle' of English Law where the husband cannot be held guilty of rape as wife 'gives up her body' to the husband on marriage

      CJI: the UOI has given a go by the hail principle, they say that there are other provisions such as DV Act for grounds of divorce

    • 17 Oct 2024 2:31 PM IST

      Nandy: Mylords maybe told later that the decision only deals with age but it deals with the issue of offence also

    • 17 Oct 2024 2:31 PM IST

      Nandy reads the decision in Independent Thought - there can be no cavil of doubt that the courts cannot create an offence

    • 17 Oct 2024 2:29 PM IST

      Nandy refers to S. 338 of the General Clauses Act - which defines the term 'offence'

      Nandy: Independent Thought decision already deals with these aspects

    • 17 Oct 2024 2:27 PM IST

      CJI: so according to you , the Act itself constitutes the offence and the exception carves out

    Next Story