Persons With Disabilities Have Right To Reservation In Promotions : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday held that persons with physical disabilities have right to reservation in promotions also.A 2-judge bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and R Subhash Reddy held so dismissing an appeal filed by the State of Kerala against a judgment of the Kerala High Court(State of Kerala vs Leesamma Joseph).The Supreme Court said that the High Court judgment was "salutary" and did not require any interference. Further, the Supreme Court directed the Kerala Government to implement reservation in promotion for disabled within 3 months.The bench followed a judgment delivered by a 3-judge bench in January 2020 in the case Siddaraju vs. State of Karnataka which held that the rule of no reservation in promotions as laid down in Indra Sawhney case has no application to Persons With Disability (PWD). In Siddaraju, a bench comprising Justices RF Nariman, V Ramasubramanian and Aniruddha Bose was considering a reference which doubted a view taken in Rajiv Kumar Gupta & Others v. Union of India & Others – (2016) 6 SCALE 417. The bench in Rajiv Gupta, in the context of Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 had noted that there is no prohibition against reservation in promotion for Persons With Disabilities. The bench in Rajiv Gupta said that the principle in Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India & Others – (1992) Supp. 3 SCC 215 against reservation in promotions will not extend to PWDs. In Siddaraju, the 3-judge bench upheld the view taken in Rajiv Gupta that persons with disability have right to promotion in reservation.In today's judgment, the Supreme Court noted that the Kerala Government has not implemented the directions in Rajiv Gupta. Accordingly, directions were given to the state to implement the directions in all posts within 3 months.BackgroundThe case was based on a claim under the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities,Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. It may be noted that this Act has been replaced with the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016.The original petitioner, Leesamma Joseph, was appointed as a typist/clerk in Police Department in 1996 on compassionate grounds as her brother had passed away while in service.She suffered from permanent disability of 55% on account of Polio. She raised a claim that she was entitled to promotion as a Senior Clerk with effect from 1st July, 2002 with all consequential benefits and as a Cashier with effect from 20th May, 2012 with all consequential benefits and thereafter as Junior Superintendentwith effect from the date of her entitlement. This claim was based on the PwD Act 1995.The Kerala Administrative Tribunal rejected her plea sating that the rule of Recruitment in the State of Kerala, General Rules and other orders issued by the Government under Section 32 of the 1995 Act did not provide for any reservation in promotions. In Kerala High Court, a division bench comprising Justices K Vinod Chandran and PV Kunhikrishnan followed Siddaraja to set aside the decision of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal.The High Court had ordered :"The applicant should be considered for her promotion based on the disability at the time when her claim originally arose; subject to her seniority with reference to the other physically challenged candidates entitled to such reservation. She also should be given the notional benefits of her promotion from the date she is found entitled. If the petitioner has not superannuated then she shall be given promotion within one month from today and all her monetary benefits shall also be given to her from that date and even if not promoted, from the date of expiry of one month from today. If the petitioner has already retired, on the basis of the notional pay, her last pay drawn shall be reckoned and her pension fixed in accordance with that"Key takeaways from the Supreme Court judgmentWhile approving the High Court judgment, the Supreme Court held :The 1995 Act recognizes right to reservation in promotion.Identification of posts for reservation as per Section 32 of the 1995 Act is a prerequisite for appointment; but appointment cannot be frustrated by refusing to identify posts.The absence of provision for reservation in the recruitment rules will not defeat the right of a PwD as such right flows from the legislation.Reservation to promotion can be given to a PwD even if the person was not originally appointed in PwD quota.A key argument raised by the State of Kerala in its appeal before the Supreme Court was that the candidate cannot be given reservation in promotion as she was appointed on compassionate grounds and not in PwD quota.The Supreme Court rejected this argument by saying that to accept it would be discriminatory and violative of the mandate of the Constitution."Once the respondent has been appointed, she is to be identically placed as others in the PwD cadre. The anomaly ...

Persons With Disabilities Have Right To Reservation In Promotions : Supreme Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Persons With Disabilities Have Right To Reservation In Promotions : Supreme Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers