LIVE UPDATES From SC [Can Persons Holding Public Office Comment On Crimes ?]

The reasons mentioned by dissenting judge Indu Malhotra is unfounded

Bonafide criticism is permissible

Thwarting the orders of the highest court cannot be countenanced

Holy book is the constitution of India

The decision of supreme court binds everyone : Justice Nariman

J. Nariman - Majority judgement cannot be used to undermine the religious faith of others.

Breaking : Sabarimala matter referred to larger bench by 3:2

J Chandrachud and Nariman dissent

Review petitions kept pending

In a legal framework, when a court does not have apostolical jurisdiction, it should tread cautiously

Whether question as to essential religious practises should be determined by the religious  heads is also to be determined

They have been referred to larger bench

Such aspects cannot be ruled out

It is overarching morality with respect to preamble of the constitution

Discussing the issue of entry of Muslim women in mosque and Dawoodi bora

There is yet another seminal issue as to the power of the court to determine if the constitutional court can interfere in such integral parts of the religion

Religious practises are not to be against public order, morality and other provisions of Part 3

Both sections of the same religious group has right to propagate practices of themselves