GYANVAPI MOSQUE SHIV LING CLAIM- Supreme Court Hearing- Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

20 May 2022 2:08 PM IST

Live Updates

20 May 2022 3:42 PM IST
J Chandrachud : If Order 7 Rule 11 is allowed, why are we spending time over this?
20 May 2022 3:42 PM IST
Sr Adv Ranjit Kumar : The order which is under challenge has worked itself out.

J Chandrachud : The challenge to the order appointing commissioner overlaps with Order 7 Rule 11. If O 7 R 11 is dismissed, he still has scope to challenge order appointing commissioner.
20 May 2022 3:39 PM IST
J Chandrachud : But in case you fail your Order 7 Rule 11 challenge, then to cause no prejudice, we can keep this SLP pending, we can post this SLP after vacation and in the meantime the Order 7 Rule 11 can be taken up.
20 May 2022 3:39 PM IST
J Chandrachud : There's another way of doing it. You have challenged the order of appointing the commissioner & if we dispose of the SLP there would be finality to that order.
20 May 2022 3:38 PM IST
Ahmadi : The damage has already been done.

DYC J: We hold the balance and we have created a sense. The need for fraternity which is crucial in our minds as well and there is need to balance. Our interim order will preserve that sense in the ground.
20 May 2022 3:37 PM IST
DYC J : We cannot allow the trial court to run amok
Ahmadi : It has already run amok.
20 May 2022 3:37 PM IST
DYC J: If we hold in your favour, they are ousted from their argument but if we accept their submission, you will be ousted. Is it right for the SC to do? We have to adopt fair process across the board.
20 May 2022 3:35 PM IST
DYC J : Our difficulty is that to accept that argument we'll have to comment on the maintainability of the suit which has to be decided. Their argument is that to decide Order 7 Rule 11 application, you have to open the Commission report.
20 May 2022 3:35 PM IST
DYC J : The moment you argue that the appointment of Commissioner is void ab initio because the suit is barred by the Act, it is far fetched, because we can't decide the maintainability of suit here. Your submission overlaps with the Order 7 Rule 11 application.
20 May 2022 3:33 PM IST
DYC J : If we accept your submission that the appointment of the commissioner was in breach of the provision of 1991 act & is without jurisdiction...

Ahmadi : My submission is different, the suit could not have proceeded.

Next Updates Previous Updates

GYANVAPI MOSQUE SHIV LING CLAIM- Supreme Court Hearing- Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Live Updates

J Chandrachud : If Order 7 Rule 11 is allowed, why are we spending time over this?

Sr Adv Ranjit Kumar : The order which is under challenge has worked itself out. J Chandrachud : The challenge to the order appointing commissioner overlaps with Order 7 Rule 11. If O 7 R 11 is dismissed, he still has scope to challenge order appointing commissioner.

J Chandrachud : But in case you fail your Order 7 Rule 11 challenge, then to cause no prejudice, we can keep this SLP pending, we can post this SLP after vacation and in the meantime the Order 7 Rule 11 can be taken up.

J Chandrachud : There's another way of doing it. You have challenged the order of appointing the commissioner & if we dispose of the SLP there would be finality to that order.

Ahmadi : The damage has already been done. DYC J: We hold the balance and we have created a sense. The need for fraternity which is crucial in our minds as well and there is need to balance. Our interim order will preserve that sense in the ground.

DYC J : We cannot allow the trial court to run amok Ahmadi : It has already run amok.

DYC J: If we hold in your favour, they are ousted from their argument but if we accept their submission, you will be ousted. Is it right for the SC to do? We have to adopt fair process across the board.

DYC J : Our difficulty is that to accept that argument we'll have to comment on the maintainability of the suit which has to be decided. Their argument is that to decide Order 7 Rule 11 application, you have to open the Commission report.

DYC J : The moment you argue that the appointment of Commissioner is void ab initio because the suit is barred by the Act, it is far fetched, because we can't decide the maintainability of suit here. Your submission overlaps with the Order 7 Rule 11 application.

DYC J : If we accept your submission that the appointment of the commissioner was in breach of the provision of 1991 act & is without jurisdiction... Ahmadi : My submission is different, the suit could not have proceeded.

Tags

Sr Adv Ranjit Kumar : The order which is under challenge has worked itself out.

J Chandrachud : The challenge to the order appointing commissioner overlaps with Order 7 Rule 11. If O 7 R 11 is dismissed, he still has scope to challenge order appointing commissioner.

Ahmadi : The damage has already been done.

DYC J: We hold the balance and we have created a sense. The need for fraternity which is crucial in our minds as well and there is need to balance. Our interim order will preserve that sense in the ground.

DYC J : We cannot allow the trial court to run amok
Ahmadi : It has already run amok.

DYC J : If we accept your submission that the appointment of the commissioner was in breach of the provision of 1991 act & is without jurisdiction...

Ahmadi : My submission is different, the suit could not have proceeded.