Tax Cases Weekly Round-Up: 14 May to 20 May, 2023
Mariya Paliwala
21 May 2023 7:22 PM IST
Supreme Court Credit Note Issued By Automobile Manufacturer To Dealer, In Consideration Of Replacement Of Defective Part, Attracts Sales Tax: Supreme Court Case Title: M/S. Tata Motors Ltd. vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes (SPL) & Anr. Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 443 The Supreme Court has ruled that a credit note issued by an automobile manufacturer...
Supreme Court
Credit Note Issued By Automobile Manufacturer To Dealer, In Consideration Of Replacement Of Defective Part, Attracts Sales Tax: Supreme Court
Case Title: M/S. Tata Motors Ltd. vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes (SPL) & Anr.
Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 443
The Supreme Court has ruled that a credit note issued by an automobile manufacturer to a dealer of automobiles, in consideration of the replacement of a defective part done by the dealer pursuant to a warranty agreement, is exigible to sales tax.
Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court Quashes Penalty Order Under BMA On Failure Of Dept. To Consider Assessee’s Email
Case Title: Prateek Chitkara Versus JCIT
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 408
The Delhi High Court has quashed the penalty order under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 (BMA) for non-consideration of the assessee’s email.
Income Tax Act - Carrier of Goods Not An ‘Owner’; Bitumen Not A ‘Valuable Article’ Under S. 69A : Supreme Court
Case Title: M/s. D.N. Singh vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Central, Patna & Anr.
Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 451
The Supreme Court has ruled that bitumen cannot be treated as a ‘valuable article’ under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench comprising Justices K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy made the observation while dealing with an appeal filed against the decision of the Patna High Court, who had upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) towards the bitumen lifted by the assessee as a carriage contractor, which was allegedly not delivered by it to the consignee- the Road Construction Department of the Government of Bihar, as instructed.
Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Triggered On A Change Of Opinion As To The Calculation Of Tax Payable By The Assessee
Case Title: Chanchal Bhagwatilal Gokhru Versus Union of India
The Bombay High Court has quashed the reassessment proceedings triggered by a change of opinion as to the calculation of tax payable by the assessee.
Karnataka High Court
Online Rummy Games Played Are Not Taxable As ‘Betting’ And ‘Gambling: Karnataka High Court Quashes GST Intimation Notice Demanding Rs. 21,000 Crores Against Gameskraft
Case Title: Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited Versus Directorate General Of Goods
The Karnataka High Court has quashed the GST Intimation Notice to the tune of Rs 21,000 crore and held that online/electronic/digital Rummy games and other Online/Electronic/Digital games played on Gameskraft’s platforms are not taxable as "betting" and "gambling".
Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Transfer Of Goods By Power Grid Corporation To Its Contractor Does Not Involve Transfer Of Ownership, Hence No Sale: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Case Title: M/S Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Versus Assessing Authority Sales Tax Circle D Jammu
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 122
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court has held that sales tax is not leviable on materials purchased by Power Grid Corporation from outside the state and transferred to contractors.
ITAT
Agricultural Operations Cannot Be Dubbed As ‘Commercial Activity’ Merely For Commercially Selling Hybrid Seeds And Open Pollinated Seed Varieties: ITAT
Case Title: Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s. Pravardhan Seeds Pvt. Ltd.
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that when agricultural activity is conducted and seeds are produced, merely because the seeds were sold commercially, the basic agricultural operations also cannot be dubbed "commercial activities" and not ‘agricultural activities’.
ITAT Deletes Income Tax Addition Towards ESOP
Case Title: Unilever India Exports Limited Versus ACIT
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the income tax addition towards ESOP.
ITAT Imposes Cost On Assessee For Being Delinquent And Lethargic In Pursuing The case Before The Authorities
Case Title: Anilkumar Champalal Jain Versus ITO
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has imposed a fine of Rs. 2000 for being delinquent and lethargic in pursuing the matter before the tax authorities.
AO Can’t Make Addition On The Basis Of Statement Without Corroborating It With Any Other Material: ITAT
Case Title: DCIT Versus M/s. Parshwa Associates
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an AO cannot make additions merely on the basis of a statement without corroborating it with any other material.
ITAT Deletes Additions On Long Term Capital Gains On The Purported, Notional, Fictitious Sale Of Jewellery
Case Title: Ballabh Prasad Aggarwal Versus ACIT
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the income tax addition on account of long-term capital gains on the purported, notional, and fictitious sale of jewellery.
Mere Payment By Account Payee Cheque Is Not Sacrosanct : ITAT Disallows Exemption On Penny Stock
Case Title: Sangeeta Devi Jhunjhunwala Versus ITO
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that mere payment by account payee check is not sacrosanct, nor can it make a non-genuine transaction genuine.
CESTAT
CESTAT Allows Refund Claim For Services Provided To The Regional Cancer Centre
Case Title: M/s Fresenius Kabi Oncology Limited Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed the income tax deduction on account of octroi and additional sales tax.
The Bench of S. S. Garg (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) has observed that the gist of the SCNs was to deny the deduction on account of Octroi and Additional Sales Tax for the reason that the same is claimed on an equal basis, even though paid on some non-excisable goods.
CESTAT Appeal Abates From The Date Of Approval Of The Resolution Plan By The NCLT: CESTAT
Case Title: M/s Jet Airways (India) Limited Versus Commissioner of Service Tax-V, Mumbai
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that from the date of approval of the resolution plan by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLT), the appeal filed by the applicant has abated, and CESTAT has become functus officio in the matters relating to the appeal filed by Jet Airways.
Refund Cannot Be Denied To Any Person Who Has Borne The Incidence Of Tax: CESTAT
Case Title: M/s Quality Builders & Contractor Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that a refund cannot be denied to any person who has borne the incidence of tax.
Penal Provision Of Central Excise Rules, 1944 Cannot Be Invoked Against The Accountant: CESTAT
Case Title: Nitin M Dhandhukia Versus C.C.E.-Ahmedabad-ii
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the penal provision of Rule 209 A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, cannot be invoked against a person who is only involved in maintaining the accounts of the company.
Department Should Not Have Invoked The Extended Time Period For Issuance Of Second Show Cause Notice Demanding Service Tax: CESTAT
Case Title: Messrs Aarvee Denims & Exports Ltd Versus C.S.T.-Service Tax - Ahmedabad
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the second show cause notice should have been for a normal period of demand and the department should not have invoked the extended time period for demanding service tax.
No Service Tax Payable On Education Services By Way Of Pre-School Education And Education Up To Higher Secondary School: CESTAT
Case Title: Mody Education Foundation Versus Commissioner of Central Excise
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that service tax is not payable on education services by way of preschool education and education up to higher secondary school.
CESTAT Allows Interest On Auction Sale Proceeds From The Date The Amount Has Been Received By The Customs Dept., Till The Date Of Disbursal
Case Title: M/s.Oriental Trimex Limited Versus Commissioner of Customs (Import)
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed interest on the auction sale proceeds from the date the amount was received by the Customs Department until the date of disbursal.
Excise Duty To Be Demanded From Job Worker, Not From Principal Manufacturer, When Transaction Is On Principal To Principal Basis: CESTAT
Case Title: M/s Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax, Excise Customs, Udaipur Versus Sonex Marmo Grani Pvt Ltd
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that there has to be excise duty demanded from the job worker and not from the principal manufacturer when transactions between the two are on a principal-to-principal basis.
Value Of Sale Of Books Cannot Be Included In The Value Of Coaching Services, No Service Tax Payable: CESTAT
Case Title: M/s. Kanhaiya Singh Vision Classes Private Limited Versus Commissioner of CGST & CX, Patna-I Commissionerate
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the value of the sale of books cannot be included in the value of coaching services and service tax is not payable.
AAR
No GST On The Difference Between Purchasing, Selling Price Of Second Hand Gold Jewellery: AAR
Applicant’s Name: White Gold Bullion Private Limited
The Karnataka Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has ruled that purchasing second-hand gold in the form of jewellery and parts of jewellery from unregistered individuals and selling it to registered or unregistered dealers after melting it in the form of lumps of gold cannot be subject to GST on the margin difference between the sale price and purchase price as stipulated in Rule 32(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017.