[Live-Updates From Supreme Court] Hearing on Section 24 Of New Land Acquisition Act- Court-3
Radhika Roy
26 Nov 2019 11:21 AM IST
Live Updates
- 26 Nov 2019 12:52 PM IST
Pg. 216 - the core issue is valuation.
Pg. 218 - Retrospective effect doesn’t mean land has not been acquired.
Pg. 220 - Rajnath Singh: lok sabha: bill should be implemented with retrospective effect. Where there’s no compensation, acquisition etc.
Pg. 228 - Prasanta Kumar Majumder: compensation should be paid with retrospective effect.
Foot of page 231 - Mr. Shetty: this act should be implemented with retrospective effect.
Pg. 234, 235 - Where provisions do not reached its present form. This is a Minister’s observation and is only on bottom of Pg. 237.
Pg. 239 - Small amendment. Which is negative.
- 26 Nov 2019 12:21 PM IST
SD - There are two situations for lapsing:
1. Where there’s no award, no possession before legislation.
J. Saran - So, you’re saying that it’s conjunctive.
J. Shah - Subsection 2 is for possession.
J. Mishra - 24(2) award has been passed 5 years back, but possession was not taken. Then what ?
SD - These are limited utilities. We will consider it.