[Live-Updates From Supreme Court] Hearing on Section 24 Of New Land Acquisition Act- Court-3
Radhika Roy
26 Nov 2019 11:21 AM IST
Live Updates
- 26 Nov 2019 3:40 PM IST
SD - Context is 2 fold and 3 fold here. We also have to look at it from the constitutional perspective. Every person cannot file writ.
J. Bhat - You have a point.
J. Banerjee - S16 should be read with S31(1). If there’s taking of livelihood, award should be given.
J. Mishra - Give us solutions.
- 26 Nov 2019 3:37 PM IST
J. Mishra - Extreme situation: money deposited in treasury, then it can be said that person refused to take the money.
SD - Let us see when the person refuses.
J. Mishra - In case person has not collected, does every deposit become illegal ?
SD - In an emergency situation in which S17 applies, you take possession before award is passed. You have to tender 80 percent payment.
J. Saran - In normal case, it’s 100%.
- 26 Nov 2019 3:27 PM IST
J. Mishra - Payment is under 31(1), deposit 31(2).
SD - Let me talk about the scheme of 31 of the old Act. Award is not a vested right. It’s just an offer. A person may accept or reject the offer.
Scheme: if the state wants to take land by Transfer of Property Act, then you get something in return - Money, land etc. That the collector is required by law to call for money and then offer the money. Regardless of whether reference made or not.
J. Bhat - So you offer and after that you take money.
SD - This is not the way the state can take land.
- 26 Nov 2019 3:08 PM IST
SD - you are right. observation of how misuse is happening.
J. Bhat - We are not going into RTI. Your case was deposition. Which is done.
J. Mishra - You are not examining. You should submit on interpretation. You are arguing conversely. You come on the issue. You are wasting time on debate. Come to the interpretation.