Khanna J: Suppose a new point is raised relating to S 45 or any other constitutional vires on a new point...Vijay Madanlal upheld the constitutional validity of certain provisions. Can a three-judges bench go into that question?

Khanna J: A new proposition not raised in Vijay Madanlal relating to one of the provisions whose vires was upheld in Vijay Madanlal...Can a three-judge bench take a different view, or must it refer it to five judges?