Datar: Indra Sawhney was delivered after so much of deliberation and discussion, that I humbly submit that there is no need to revisit it.

Datar: Why I mentioned creamy lawyer was because in Jarnail Singh, the Court noted that there was a 8 out of 9 concurrence. I submit that it is similar for the 50% principle.

Datar: The Parliament for 30 years has left 50% alone, and whenever it has to circumvented, legislative amendments have been made.

Bench: This 50% has been vitiated in many cases. And that’s why they are seeking for a reference. How do you respond to that.