Advocate Shahrukh Alam makes submissions.

There is a difference between a constitutional court trying to enforce 'rule of law' generally speaking, and an intervention in relation to executive inaction where the inaction has resulted in a continued violation of fundamental right. In the latter case, it's not only imperative to intervene and issue a mandamus ( to act) but also to develop law with regard to that manifest arbitrariness in inaction

SG interjects.. "I never argues judicial arbitrariness"