Dhawan: There is really no dispute that its a minority, we accept the connection the MAO, AMU was just the alter ego, it was the continuity of the MAO Act

Dhawan refering to s.17 - the more important aspect is the establishment and the right that flows from it , that's important as the court recognises it but where this it get knocked out - on the first stage, it says you were established by statute so where is your right to administer?