Understanding Probate: A Legal Framework

In many cases, these two legal processes often overlap, raising various questions and challenging the jurisdiction of civil courts and probate courts. This article explores the legal framework of probate, its implications, and the jurisdictional challenges when a suit for partition overlaps with a probate petition.

Meaning Of Probate?

As per the Cambridge Lexicon, Probate is a legal process that decides the correctness/authenticity of a person's will^[1]. Moreover, as per the Indian Succession Act, 1925^[2] (hereinafter referred to “the Act”), probate is defined as a certified copy of the will, with the court's seal, authorizing the executor to act on behalf of the estate. This legal process ensures that the will is genuine and reflects the deceased's last wishes.

In India, different states have different mandates qua the requirement of seeking probate even where the will is registered. The Indian laws don't mandate the registration of a will^[3] as the same is optional. However, some states require the people to seek probate from a competent court irrespective of the registration of a will, whereas in states/ UTs like New Delhi probate is not mandatory for wills.

Ergo, a will is often followed by registration, and probate in many states across the nation.

Executor

The Act states that a probate can only be granted to an executor named in the will, either explicitly or implicitly. Minors, individuals of unsound mind, and associations are often not considered as legitimate executors.

An executor is a person named in a will who is entrusted by a testator (maker of a will) to execute the intentions reflected in a will and deliver/ divide the estate among beneficiaries as per the will.

Adjudication of Probate Petitions

The Act lays down a comprehensive mechanism qua the presentation and adjudication of probate petitions. A probate petition can only be filed before a probate court depicting fundamental details such as the date of death of a testator, the details of the assets, legal heirs, beneficiaries, executor, etc., The petition must be signed and verified by the petitioner and, by one of the witnesses to a will.

The probate court usually asks for objections or NOC from the legal heirs and the concerned parties; also the court seeks a valuation report from a valuer qua the value of the testator's properties – primarily to adjudicate the pecuniary jurisdiction of the probate court.

The probate petition usually witnesses a trial similar to other civil trials, and therefore often takes years to get settled and decided.

Conclusiveness of Probate

As per Section 273 of the Act, probate or letters of administration serve as conclusive proof of the executor's legal authority over the estate. This provides protection to debtors and third parties knowing that the will has been legally validated. Probate also serves as final proof that the will is genuine and valid, offering assurance to all stakeholders involved.

Partition Suit vs Probate Petition

A common legal conflict arises when a partition suit is filed before or alongside probate proceedings. A partition suit is generally filed seeking division of property among heirs when an owner of properties dies without leaving any will.

Now it is quite common to observe that few legal heirs of an owner support the case of partition claiming that the death was intestate, whereas other legal heirs often dispute the partition suits on the basis of a will. Similar counterclaims are also raised in probate petitions.

Due to such challenges, often two different cases are contested qua the same/ similar issue of course of division of properties after the death of a person.

The law of civil proceedings^[4] state that if a case/ issue is pending adjudication before a competent court, then the other court can't decide or/ and adjudicate the same during the pendency of the said issue.

On one hand, it may seem that probate petitions and partition suits deal with the same issue, hence section 10 of the CPC will act as a bar qua the later case. On the other hand, we may consider that the question of will and intestate death though sound similar have strong differences, ergo bar of subjudice is not applicable.

It is trite law that where the bare provisions of law don't clarify a legal tussle, then judicial precedents act as law and become the ruling principle on such issues. Hence, we will be discussing some relevant case laws in brief qua the issue at hand.

Relevant case laws

In the case of Amar Deep Singh v. State & Others^[5], the Delhi High Court held that probate courts alone have the jurisdiction to decide on wills. Even if the civil suit was filed first, the probate court's jurisdiction doesn't get absolved. Further, the court held that probate petitions can one be decided by probate courts, and therefore civil courts have no jurisdiction.

In Shamita Singh v. Rashmi Ahluwalia^[6] the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that probate courts have primacy in deciding issues related to wills, Letters of Administrators, thus the Apex Court had directed to transfer a partition suit from Delhi High Court to Bombay High Court wherein the probate court was pending adjudication despite the fact that the suit was partition was filed prior in time.

Practical Implications

The general rule embodied under section 10 of the CPC prohibits any court from adjudicating an issue that is already pending adjudication before some other competent court seems to be not applicable in the cases of probate petitions and partition suits.

It is submitted that the courts have given preference to probate petitions and probate courts qua the issues concerning will and estate of a person. Though this observation is a departure from the aforesaid fundamental rule of subjudice, but the same is an extension of a principle of special courts.

Since probate courts are primarily set up for deciding issues related to inheritance including wills, thus the judicial precedents placing more reliance on probate petitions over partition suits irrespective of their timings of filing find roots in the established principles of law.

The intersection of probate and partition suits highlights the complexity of deciding a deceased person's estate, especially when multiple heirs and conflicting claims are involved.

This legal framework underscores the importance of probate as a tool to confirm the authenticity of a will before any distribution or division of assets takes place. Once probate is granted, it becomes easier for the executor to manage the estate and for the heirs to claim their share, knowing that the will has been legally validated.

Probate plays a fundamental role in legal cases concerning the estate of a deceased person. It serves as conclusive proof of the will's validity and authorizes the executor to manage and distribute the estate. When a partition suit is filed concerning the same estate, the legal process becomes more complicated. However, the probate court's decision on the validity of the will takes precedence, and partition suits are often get adjudicated along with the probate court and the same helps the courts to arrive at a uniform decision. This approach prevents conflicting legal outcomes and ensures that the deceased's estate is distributed fairly, according to his intentions.

By understanding the relationship between probate petitions and partition suits, and the legal principles that govern both processes, individuals can navigate these complex legal matters more effectively. Whether contesting for partitions or contesting a will in court, knowing the legal framework helps protect the rights of all stakeholders involved.

Views are personal.