Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafri's Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi And State Functionaries- LIVE UPDATES

Sibal: The SC said that the Mag. will deal with the trial of accused based on this final report. Not relating to complaint, not w.r.t. Gulberg.

Sibal: The Supreme Court is aware that Gulberg trial is going on, they assigned the Magistrate who took cognisance of the Gulberg matter, because Zakia was resident of Gulberg and no other reason.

Sibal: Milords it is a fresh report. It is collected by SIT after the Court asked it to look into it. This material is not just the complaint, not just limited to Gulberg.

Sibal: The Court said investigate all these. Not Gulberg. 

Sibal: If everything was hunky dory in Gujarat, why would NHRC seek transfer of trials. 

Sibal: Argument is made what is wrong with VHP. In the tapes the lawyers who were PPs reveal things that they have done, would shock the conscience of the Court. SIT says how does it matter.

Sibal: And the Court said burden should be shifted. The SIT never took objection. Suddenly her (Teesta) image is being besmirched.

Sibal: In between what happened? The NHRC went to SC. That is how the appellant became an intervenor. The appellant (Teesta) who is now blacklisted, worked with the NHRC.

Sibal: This also is somewhat curious. My Ld. Friend and SG had argued that the State did what it could, there was no issue. And the State took all steps. In 2003, the SC stayed the nine trials. Why did this court stay the nine trials?

Sibal: Another statement was made that there was no violence till 1 o’clock. If there was no violence till 1, why did you call army at 2.