No Re-NEET, NEET-UG Not Cancelled : Live Updates From Supreme Court [July 23]
SG submits that NTA has filed an affidavit clarifying the allegation of bias by the IIT Madras Director, SG states that the IIT Madras director for this year is an ex-officio member of the governing body of NTA and not in the managing committee which calls the shots
Details can be read here :
CJI: only option 4 is correct , not case where both the options are correct
CJI: the IIT Report is staring us in the face, assuming we are not setting aside the whole exam, what if we say that option 4 will be the correct answer, but for anybody who answers option 2 there will be no negative marking? Talk the director of NTA
SG : I think reasonable. But Lordships may ensure that it doesn't become a precedent then for every question there would be a litigation
Counsel for the NEET topper who scored 720/720 submitted that not allowing marks for the incorrect answer in the old text book would reduce her scores to 715/720 . Counsel says that in the bulletin there was no whisper of the latest editions to be referred to
CJI points to the FAQs released post declaration of the NEET results
CJI: and though we gave the director time until 12 PM, before 10 o'clock we had the answer on the table. It would have taken probably 10 seconds to answer the question
SG: those who relied upon an authorised text of the NCERT and gave the answer should also not get the disadvantage of the it
J Misra : the question here is not about rote learning, you have to have the fundamentals clear. So far as the stable atom is concerned it has to be a radioactive element ....being a science student I am a little bit aware of it.
CJI : yesterday we referred to IIT by your consent
SG: yes I consented your lordship
CJI: I think we should not go by editions etc, we will go by the correct answer. Suppose the latest NCERT edition has the wrong answer, but the student improvised and prepared well and gave the correct answer ....IIT tells us what is the correct answer! (laughs)
SG: its a trick question not an ambiguous question Ill say
CJI: see option 2 says - both statement 1 and 2 are correct; option 4 says statement 1 is correct but statement 2 is incorrect, so both cannot co-exist together
SG: in case of dispute both the marks are to be counted
CJI: how can that be possible? here if you look at the two answers, each of the excludes the other.