Adv. Reepak Kansal now appears.
CJI asks the Petitioners if the organisations have been added. Parihar responds that there is no information of the organisations.
Parihar compares the situation in Shaheen Bagh and the Farmer’s protests.
CJI: How many people had blocked the road there ? Will the number of people not determine this ? Who will take responsibility ? There can be no precedent in law and order situation.
CJI: If there is any case, we will hear him. But, he has no case before us.
Om Prakash Parihar makes submissions now.
SG interrupts the proceeding: I apologise. Mr. Salve has sent another message, seeking to assist in the current matter. He says that he has a similar case.
CJI: Please don’t interrupt us, there’s no case of Salve before us.
Tiwari: Petitioner is not a farmer, he’s a law student.
CJI: This is such an important matter. Why can’t you argue it properly ? We are asking, what is your standing, your issues and your prayer.
There seems to be confusion pertaining to Salve’s appearance as the Courtmaster states that no information regarding his appearance has been given for the current matters.
Tiwari continues his submissions.
There seems to be confusion pertaining to Salve’s appearance as the Courtmaster states that no information regarding his appearance has been given for the current matters.
Tiwari continues his submissions.
SG once again requests the Court to unmute Salve.
Courtmaster informs CJI that no AOR has informed of Salve’s appearance.
Adv. Dushyant Tiwari begins submissions: You have already passed a judgement in the Amit Sahni case (Shaheen Bagh judgement). Please look at Para 19.
CJI: Why are you commenting on the Courtmaster ? We are asking is Mr. Salve appearing in the matter.
SG: I just received a message.
CJI: We don’t have any information of him appearing.