"If I prefer King Fu Over Yoga, Will I Become Chinese Spy?' Interesting Courtroom Exchange In Disha Ravi Bail Hearing

ASG: Yes, kindly see the facts cumulatively.. also, we are at the preliminary stage of investigation.

#DishaRavi

#Toolkit

ASG: Yes, kindly see the facts cumulatively.. also, we are at the preliminary stage of investigation.

#DishaRavi

#Toolkit

ASG: The document says in various ways, that India is a bad country, it is killing Muslims, asks for the hoisting of the Khalistani flag, which was also hoisted.

Court: We don't want repetitions.

#DishaRavi

#Toolkit

ASG: A document like the Toolkit clearly shows that the tendency to create public disorder was very much present. Section 124A could be invoked even where public disorder was not caused, here it has actually been caused.

#DishaRavi

#Toolkit

ASG reads " activities involving incitement to violence or intention or tendency to create public disorder or cause disturbance of public peace."

#DishaRavi

#Toolkit

ASG: This was the case where the constitutional validity of sec. 124A was challenged. Kindly come to para 27 of this judgment.

#DishaRavi

#Toolkit

ASG now relying on the Kedar Nath judgment. 

ASG: This is of course not a simple case of a bandh but the principle applies.

ASG now refers to Section 124A of IPC on sedition.

ASG: Even an attempt to incite is sufficient as per the SC.

#DishaRavi

#Toolkit

ASG continues reading "The case at hand is one which led to the destruction of property and loss of lives, because of irresponsible and illegal acts of some in the name of bandh or hartal or strike."

#DishaRavi

#Toolkit

ASG reads "No person has any right to destroy another's property in the guise of bandh or hartal or strike, irrespective of the proclaimed reasonableness of the cause or the question whether there is or was any legal sanction for the same."