Aryan Khan, Arbaaz Merchant & Munmun Dhamecha Bail Hearing Before Special NDPS Court-LIVE UPDATES

2021-10-13 10:35 GMT

Desai on the law. Says he wants to read the court's own observations in an order passed earlier this year in Sheldon D'Silva's case.

2021-10-13 10:32 GMT

Desai submits a chart regarding what was recovered from whom and who has named whom.
He says the intermediate and commercial recoveries are from people Khan had nothing to do with.
In law there should have been different CRs

2021-10-13 10:28 GMT

Desai - There is no signature (on the panchnama).
Now they may say they have found this and that. But the custody is for the arrest. It does not apply.

2021-10-13 10:27 GMT

Desai on how conspiracy u/s 29 doesn't apply- Only Aryan and Arbaaz were together.
But today the entire reply is on Section 29. So far are Aryan Khan is concerned they were conscious there is no conspiracy.
If Arbaaz wanted to consume on his own, where is the conspiracy.

2021-10-13 10:27 GMT

Desai says that the only thing to charge him with even consumption is a so called confessional statement under section 67 NDPS.
In law there is no attempt, they were picked up at the gangway. So 28 would not apply.

2021-10-13 10:23 GMT

Desai reads Aryan Khan's arrest memo.
He was arrested on for 20b, 27 and 35 of the NDPS Act. Not 28 and 29(conspiracy) added later on.
Says even 20b would not apply because there is no possession.

2021-10-13 10:22 GMT

Desai-Wherever they felt it appropriate,they have invoked 27A. But there is no material, no possession except that one sentence of Whatsapp chats.
When your honour hears arguments on this international drug trafficking,please bear in mind he is not charged with 27A.

2021-10-13 10:17 GMT

Desai - The only section '27A' of the NDPS Act that deals with illicit traffic, is not applied to Aryan Khan. It is not invoked till now because they are aware Mr. Khan is not involved in any illicit trafficking. It is applied to others, not to him.

2021-10-13 10:14 GMT

Desai - The allegation of illicit trafficking is inherently absurd. This boy who has nothing, not even on the vessels. It is a false allegations.

2021-10-13 10:12 GMT

Desai on the NCBs allegations that Khan is part of an illicit drug chain.
"This is a very serious term that they have dumped on Aryan Khan. I have no doubt that my friends know what is illicit trafficking according to.the NDPS Act means."

Aryan Khan, Arbaaz Merchant & Munmun Dhamecha Bail Hearing Before Special NDPS Court-LIVE UPDATES

Desai on the law. Says he wants to read the court's own observations in an order passed earlier this year in Sheldon D'Silva's case.

Desai submits a chart regarding what was recovered from whom and who has named whom.
He says the intermediate and commercial recoveries are from people Khan had nothing to do with.
In law there should have been different CRs

Desai - There is no signature (on the panchnama).
Now they may say they have found this and that. But the custody is for the arrest. It does not apply.

Desai on how conspiracy u/s 29 doesn't apply- Only Aryan and Arbaaz were together.
But today the entire reply is on Section 29. So far are Aryan Khan is concerned they were conscious there is no conspiracy.
If Arbaaz wanted to consume on his own, where is the conspiracy.

Desai says that the only thing to charge him with even consumption is a so called confessional statement under section 67 NDPS.
In law there is no attempt, they were picked up at the gangway. So 28 would not apply.

Desai reads Aryan Khan's arrest memo.
He was arrested on for 20b, 27 and 35 of the NDPS Act. Not 28 and 29(conspiracy) added later on.
Says even 20b would not apply because there is no possession.

Desai-Wherever they felt it appropriate,they have invoked 27A. But there is no material, no possession except that one sentence of Whatsapp chats.
When your honour hears arguments on this international drug trafficking,please bear in mind he is not charged with 27A.

Desai - The only section '27A' of the NDPS Act that deals with illicit traffic, is not applied to Aryan Khan. It is not invoked till now because they are aware Mr. Khan is not involved in any illicit trafficking. It is applied to others, not to him.

Desai - The allegation of illicit trafficking is inherently absurd. This boy who has nothing, not even on the vessels. It is a false allegations.

Desai on the NCBs allegations that Khan is part of an illicit drug chain.
"This is a very serious term that they have dumped on Aryan Khan. I have no doubt that my friends know what is illicit trafficking according to.the NDPS Act means."

Similar News

Last Date Extended!! -Apply Now To Get 25% Scholarship For Judicial Service Examination Preparation Course By LiveLaw Academy

100 Important Supreme Court Judgments Of 2024 - Part 1 [1-25]

2024 Round-Up| Constitution Bench Decisions Of Supreme Court

25 Notable Supreme Court Judgments Of 2024 On Bail & Arrest

Centre Notifies Appointment Of Chief Justices Of Himachal Pradesh & Uttarakhand High Courts

High Time Public Service Commissions Ensure Modern Indian Bureaucracy Draws The Best Talent : Justice PS Narasimha

Wife Imposing Her Friends & Family At Husband's Residence Against His Will Amounts To Cruelty: Calcutta High Court

President Appoints Former SC Judge Justice V. Ramasubramanian As Chairperson Of National Human Rights Commission

Caramel Popcorn Contains Added Sugar, Tax Rate Will Be Higher Than Namkeen, Clarifies GST Council

100 Important Supreme Court Judgments Of 2024 - Part 2 [26-50]

Not Necessary To File Separate Application For Delay Condonation Along With Application To Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree : Supreme Court

No Registration Or Stamp Duty Required For Compromise Decree Acquiring Property With Pre-Existing Right : Supreme Court

Aryan Khan, Arbaaz Merchant & Munmun Dhamecha Bail Hearing Before Special NDPS Court-LIVE UPDATES

Desai on the law. Says he wants to read the court's own observations in an order passed earlier this year in Sheldon D'Silva's case.

Desai submits a chart regarding what was recovered from whom and who has named whom. He says the intermediate and commercial recoveries are from people Khan had nothing to do with. In law there should have been different CRs

Desai - There is no signature (on the panchnama). Now they may say they have found this and that. But the custody is for the arrest. It does not apply.

Desai on how conspiracy u/s 29 doesn't apply- Only Aryan and Arbaaz were together. But today the entire reply is on Section 29. So far are Aryan Khan is concerned they were conscious there is no conspiracy. If Arbaaz wanted to consume on his own, where is the conspiracy.

Desai says that the only thing to charge him with even consumption is a so called confessional statement under section 67 NDPS. In law there is no attempt, they were picked up at the gangway. So 28 would not apply.

Desai reads Aryan Khan's arrest memo. He was arrested on for 20b, 27 and 35 of the NDPS Act. Not 28 and 29(conspiracy) added later on. Says even 20b would not apply because there is no possession.

Desai-Wherever they felt it appropriate,they have invoked 27A. But there is no material, no possession except that one sentence of Whatsapp chats.When your honour hears arguments on this international drug trafficking,please bear in mind he is not charged with 27A.

Desai - The only section '27A' of the NDPS Act that deals with illicit traffic, is not applied to Aryan Khan. It is not invoked till now because they are aware Mr. Khan is not involved in any illicit trafficking. It is applied to others, not to him.

Desai - The allegation of illicit trafficking is inherently absurd. This boy who has nothing, not even on the vessels. It is a false allegations.

Desai on the NCBs allegations that Khan is part of an illicit drug chain. "This is a very serious term that they have dumped on Aryan Khan. I have no doubt that my friends know what is illicit trafficking according to.the NDPS Act means."

Similar News

Desai submits a chart regarding what was recovered from whom and who has named whom.
He says the intermediate and commercial recoveries are from people Khan had nothing to do with.
In law there should have been different CRs

Desai - There is no signature (on the panchnama).
Now they may say they have found this and that. But the custody is for the arrest. It does not apply.

Desai on how conspiracy u/s 29 doesn't apply- Only Aryan and Arbaaz were together.
But today the entire reply is on Section 29. So far are Aryan Khan is concerned they were conscious there is no conspiracy.
If Arbaaz wanted to consume on his own, where is the conspiracy.

Desai says that the only thing to charge him with even consumption is a so called confessional statement under section 67 NDPS.
In law there is no attempt, they were picked up at the gangway. So 28 would not apply.

Desai reads Aryan Khan's arrest memo.
He was arrested on for 20b, 27 and 35 of the NDPS Act. Not 28 and 29(conspiracy) added later on.
Says even 20b would not apply because there is no possession.

Desai-Wherever they felt it appropriate,they have invoked 27A. But there is no material, no possession except that one sentence of Whatsapp chats.
When your honour hears arguments on this international drug trafficking,please bear in mind he is not charged with 27A.

Desai on the NCBs allegations that Khan is part of an illicit drug chain.
"This is a very serious term that they have dumped on Aryan Khan. I have no doubt that my friends know what is illicit trafficking according to.the NDPS Act means."