Arvind Kejriwal's Plea Against ED Arrest : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing
SG: Let's see S.41 CrPC. Why a common man not invoke the same jurisdiction for any other offense?
SG: At the time of trial, court can examine whether S.19 was complied with or not
SG: Please see the 2005 Rules...sub-rule (3) is manner of forwarding...nobody can tamper with it till trial court examines it
SG: More rigorous the provisions of arrest, less the scrutiny by courts. This is my submission
SG takes the court through Section 62 and 67 PMLA
SG: If one of the conditions of S.19 is not complied with, a punishment is provided. but that is also at the stage of trial
J Khanna: as far as maintainability is concerned, they have argued that S.19 is not satisfied and remand order should not have been passed
SG: S.19 PMLA your Lordships have seen...everybody would not have privilege as petitioner has...court is called to interfere with a petitioner under Article 227 read with...
SG: S.19 has certain conditions. Only high-ranking officials given power. There should be material in possession. I must also have a reason to believe, to be recorded in writing