Arvind Kejriwal's Challenge To ED Arrest : Live Updates From Delhi High Court Hearing

Raju: And then to blame that we did it when elections are coming. All of this was from much prior. All of this was not at the time of election. It is only a bogey to deflect court from real issues.

Raju: No calculation was done as to why 5 percent profit was made 12 percent.

Only inference is that it was done so that 7 percent of portion is used for giving kickbacks. The fact that there is a scam is beyond doubt today. Howsoever hue and cry you make, its a fact that a scam was there. 

Raju: Indo Spirit was granted wholesale license despite complaint of cartelization. Complainant was forced to take back complaint.

Raju: Those who didn't give kickbacks were asked to surrender licenses so that those being favoured be given spaces.

Raju: Large no of accused have been refused bail by trial court, this court and SC in this case. In a money laundering case, one reason to reject bail is prima facie opinion of money laundering against the accused. Please look at section 45 in this context.

Raju refers to section 45 of PMLA.

Raju: I am relying on two judgments to show that cognizance show that there is a prima facie case. Money laundering offence is made out by these cognizance orders.

Raju refers to other cognizance orders.

Raju: The last order is of 19 December 2023. Court took cognizance of two complaints. As far as cognizance is concerned, cognizance would intake that there is a prima facie case for trying accused. 

Raju refers to second cognizance order of subsequent prosecution complaint.

Raju refers to cognizance order, says: Categorical finding that there is money laundering. Cognizance of the offence of money laundering. Nobody has challenged the order.