Singhvi cites judicial precedents (Satender Antil, Arnesh Kumar, etc,)
Singhvi: Mechanically saying S41, S41A CrPC is not enough. Any non-compliance entitles one to bail.
ASG: we have a preliminary objection to the bail matter. Arguments on bail and arrest being mixed
J Kant: Let Mr Singhvi argue, if he wants, on merits
J Kant: Please keep in mind this is a bail matter
ASG: The amount of time given to him may be given to us
Singhvi: My friend becomes more fair when he appears for CBI
Singhvi: I am the most captive interogatee. The only point of arrest was to have insurance, if I win in the ED case. They have to give pleadings, demonstrate.
Singhvi: Imminence of me committing further offence was minus, not zero. He was found fit for release by Supreme Court two times!
Singhvi: This is very important. These statutes are for paper? They arrest under S.41, without giving details under what...they have to be mandatorily given...none of (a) to (e) was applicable.
Singhvi (to ASG): What you are calling technicality are procedural safeguards!
ASG: S.41A is when they call him. If he is already there, there is no question of giving him...hyper-technical
SInghvi: You don't defeat liberty by saying technicality. Least of all the prosecutor. Please wait, much more is coming.
Singhvi: There is no S.41A notice.
J Kant: Does the application not amount to notice? You are already in custody. It's a statutory obligation on them...
Singhvi: There is no application given to me by CBI. It was between CBI and court
Singhvi: They move an application to examine and interrogate as per S.41A CrPC! It's proof that they did not want to arrest him.