Uttarakhand UCC Bill Mandates Registration Of Live-In Relationship Within One Month Of Entering Into Relationship

Update: 2024-02-06 12:00 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
story

In a significant move, Uttarakhand's Uniform Civil Code Bill was tabled in the State Assembly during its special session. This Bill, presented by Uttarakhand's Chief Minister, Pushkar Singh Dhami, aims to incorporate several changes to establish consistent laws for personal issues like marriage, divorce, inheritance and so on. One of the crucial changes proposed by the instant Bill is...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

In a significant move, Uttarakhand's Uniform Civil Code Bill was tabled in the State Assembly during its special session. This Bill, presented by Uttarakhand's Chief Minister, Pushkar Singh Dhami, aims to incorporate several changes to establish consistent laws for personal issues like marriage, divorce, inheritance and so on.

One of the crucial changes proposed by the instant Bill is the mandatory registration of live-in relationships. Registration is supposed to be made to a Registrar within one month of the “date of entering the relationship.” Notably, on failure to do so, the Bill also prescribes punishment of 3 months of maximum imprisonment or a fine up ₹10,000 or both.

At the outset, the Bill defines a live-in relationship as one between a man and a woman who cohabit in a shared household through a relationship in the nature of marriage, provided that such relations are not prohibited.

Section 378 of the Bill makes it obligatory for the parties in a live-in relationship who are residing in the State to submit 'a statement of the live-in relationship' to the Registrar within whose jurisdiction the couples are living.

Apart from this, the residents of Uttarakhand who are in a live-in relationship outside the State have the option of giving this statement to the Registrar of their respective jurisdictions.

Summary Inquiry To Be Conducted By The Registrar

Under Section 381, the Registrar shall examine the contents of the Statement provided by the Couples and conduct a summary inquiry. This inquiry will essentially, among other things, also look into whether one of the partners is married or already in a live-in relationship, whether any of the partners is aminor, or whether the consent is free or obtained by force, coercion, undue influence or misrepresentation about identity.

Further, Sub-clause 3 of Section 381 also entitles the Registrar to summon the partners/persons or any other person for verification and require the partners/persons to supply additional information or evidence for inquiry.

Registrar Can Also Refuse To Register The Relationship

Imperatively, the Registrar also has the power to refuse to register such a relationship. In such cases, the Registrar is required to inform the reasons in writing.

Section 381(4) gives the Registrar two options. The Registrar, within thirty days of the receipt of the statement of live-in relationship, will either:

(a) enter such statement in a prescribed register for registering the live-in relationship, and issue a registration certificate in the prescribed format to the partners/persons; or

(b) refuse to register such statement, in which case the Registrar shall inform the partners/persons of the reasons in writing for such refusal.”

According to the Bill, incorporating such a statement in a prescribed register is only 'for the purposes of record' (Section 382).

Besides, it may also be noted that the Registrar is required to inform the local police station and parents/guardians if any of the parties to the live-in relationship is less than 21 years old.

Provisions For Maintenance And Child

The Bill also mandates payment of maintenance, similar to marriage, in case a woman in a live-in relationship is deserted by her partner.

“Section 388: If a woman gets deserted by her live-in partner, she shall be entitled to claim maintenance from her live-in partner for which she may approach the competent Court having jurisdiction over the place where they last cohabited, and in such a case the provisions contained in Chapter 5, Part -1 of this Code shall mutatis-mutandis apply.”

The Bill also states that the child of a live-in relationship shall be legitimate (Section 379).

Last year, the Supreme Court dismissed a PIL seeking mandatory registration of live-in relationships.


Click here to read the Bill

Tags:    

Similar News