Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case [Feb 28]

Singhvi: Third, the consequence of the governor's decision of floor test- there is no way a governor can interfere like this specially when the matter is sub judice or pending. This is sub judice at two levels- at court's level and at speaker's level.

Singhvi: The positive and negative injuction is not only factually wrong and has changed the government but it is also juristically wrong. Only Supreme Court can touch that.

Singhvi: Can you disable the speaker so easily? Nabam Rebia is the main standing obstacle and we've argued on that. That's consequence one. Second is positive and negative injuction which are against Kihoto.

Abhishek Singhvi : Would my lords not want to prevent such consequences by dealing with the law- that is the question. My submission is these four-five consequences must be taken into account.